Categories
Activism News

OAHSPE Listening Project

As we here at the Canadian Nationalist Party have been saying for a while now: the only thing left in this society that has any legitimacy is the Church.

Every other institution has been corrupted. The Church is all that remains.

In furtherance of the faith, and in an effort to foster relations of goodwill amongst our fellow countrymen, we have begun transcribing into audio format the OAHSPE Cosmon Bible.

This is meant to be a publicly accessible resource for listening to the OAHSPE, and an alternative to reading through the text-based version.

The OAHSPE is considered a work of divine revelation. It was produced in the early 19th century by spiritual channel, and speaks of a new dawning age where man is not beholden to any intermediary between himself and his Creator.

For more information, please visit www.cosmon.ca.

Categories
News

Blackmail

On March 31st, 2022, Elections Canada de-registered the Canadian Nationalist Party while it’s Leader was being arbitrarily held in custody.

In furtherance of transitioning Canada into the world’s first “post-national” country, the Government of Canada is maliciously prosecuting opposition party leaders. As a refult, our nation has been illegally deprived of it’s right to electoral democracy, and in the absence of a democracy, the Crown has forfeighted inpersonam jurisdiction.

They have no right to police our speech. Indeed, the prosecution against us today is enabled only through the deliberate withholding of the evidence used to effect the arbitrary state of imprisonment which subsequently led to the Party being de-registered.

Since 2017, our Party right to access to public property has been infringed.

One such example took place during the 43rd Federal Election in 2019 when our Party was denied a permit to assemble at Civic Square in Saskatoon in order to communicate our policies to general voters. Meanwhile, the City of Saskatoon granted similar permits to competing political parties (such as the NDP).

The exclusion from public property does not end with access to Civic Square. It has been consistent and ubiquitous since 2017, including university campuses, public libraries, and convention centers. Elections Canada themselves even refuses to list/update our Party’s contact information listed on their website.

This denial of access to public property now characterizes criminal proceedings against us. The opposition is zealous in their accusations but neglectful in providing the means to make full and answer and defence to the charge.

No legitimate administration would conduct themselves this way. Instead, what we have is a country occupied by foreign powers to the detriment of naturalized Canadians. Harm is being done to Canadian interests as a result of the refusal to disclose information that has been used in a special operational capacity to supress nationalism and further their agenda of “post-nationalism”.

In 2015, the Liberal Party (who now forms a majority government) made it clear that “post-nationalism” is part of their political platform. However, this does not excuse them from Canadian constitutionality, which includes the common law right to make full answer and defence.

If the Crown desires to prosecute us for our political speech, they must disclose the information they used to deprive Canada of it’s ‘Nationalist’ electoral option.

Categories
Notice

Required To Live Where Unemployed

The same administration that has deprived us of political standing is ordering us to reside in a locale that is not only anti-nationalistic, but undemocratic.

There is no democracy here.

This might not be a problem in itself, but combined with the fact that this same administration is refusing to disclose the information that has been used to de-register our Party, and deprive us of a democratic channel, it is a conflict of interest. We reserve our section 11(a) Charter right to be informed of the specifics of occurrence #2019-919038 within a reasonable time.

There is no legal channel to advocate our policies. What we see is a society that claims to be democratic, but when reason exists to demonstrate the contrary, the affected Party is maligned and ignored.

Under the treaty of Magna Carta, we are not to be deprived of our political standing except by way of judgement of our peers or by the law of Canada.

“No free man shall be deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his peers or by the law of the territory.”

  • Clause 39, Magna Carta

And in particular, the Treaty of Paris provides:

“His Britannick Majesty, on his side, agrees to grant the liberty of the Catholic religion to the inhabitants of Canada: he will, in consequence, give the most precise and most effectual orders, that his new Roman Catholic subjects may profess the worship of their religion according to the rites of the Romish church, as far as the laws of Great Britain permit.”

– Article 4, Treaty Of Paris (February 10th, 1763)

So while Saskatchewan treats our profession as a crime (Beware The Parasitic Tribe), they are required to inform the accused of the information used to proceed against them, and to do so within a reasonable time (RCMP file #P-2025-00838).

The Crown has since neglected our right under the Privacy Act to a judicial review in the matter. This delay in acknowledging our right to access the information used to de-register the Canadian Nationalist Party is causing the ideology of nationalism to be excluded from society.

Therefore, we intend to protest the continued infringement of our mobility rights as provided by section 6 of the Charter.

If the Crown is going to restrict our access to public property, we will (in return) nationalize Crown property.

Categories
Statement

Bodily Harm Disputed

On June 22nd, 2022, Crown Prosecutor Ryan Snyder presented fabricated evidence to a jury in order to substantiate their claim that I caused bodily harm to women in Regina (Information #991153654).

The fabrication consisted of photographic evidence depicting bruising and swelling to the complainant (Exhibit P-1). However, the injuries show to the jury in this photograph were digitally manufactured.

Upon objection from the accused, Justice Klatt refused further examination of the fabricated photograph.

The complainant(s) testified that they were “slapped”, but the injuries depicted in the photograph were not even on the side of the face the complainant(s) were slapped.

According to the complainant(s) statement, they were able to (eventually) confirm at the hospital that their arm “wasn’t broken”.

The accused maintains that this presentation of fabricated evidence to the jury demonstrates the prosecution was conducted maliciously (as stated at trial) and with the aim of discrediting Canadian nationalism. We also maintain that (as a result of this malicious prosecution) more harm has been done to Canadian interests than the accused has caused any victim.

Fabricating Evidence
Every one who, with intent to mislead, fabricates anything with intent that it shall be used as evidence in a judicial proceeding, existing or proposed, by any means other than perjury or incitement to perjury is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

  • Section 137, Criminal Code

The exhibit shown to the jury was digitally edited to substantiate the claim of bodily harm.

Definition:
bodily harm means any hurt or injury to a person that interferes with the health or comfort of the person and that is more than merely transient or trifling in nature;

  • section 2, Criminal Code

The Crown originally laid charges under section 268, claiming that the accused “maimed” the complainant (Information #991111114(2)), but later reduced these charges to section 267 assault causing bodily harm.

The accused maintains that the verdict returned by the jury was a result of fabricated evidence.

What we see in Saskatchewan is a prosecution that is oriented toward damaging Canadian nationalism rather than ensuring the accused person is provided a fair trial as required by law.

The copies of this photograph disclosed to the accused are significantly different than that which was shown to the jury. However, the accused was unable to rebut the claim of bodily harm because the original photograph was inaccessible to them while incarcerated.

The names of the complainant(s) have not been published here for discretionary purposes.

Categories
Activism

Double Jeopardized

Once again, the Province of Saskatchewan is attempting to criminally proceed against us in response to our political speech Beware The Parasitic Tribe. However, the Crown has yet to provide us a public hearing in the matter as the information used to de-register the Canadian Nationalist Party remains undisclosed.

For those who have bothered to listen, I have been raising this objection for several years now.

Proceedings in criminal and penal matters

“Any Canadian charged with a criminal offense has the right, if finally found guilty and punished for the offence, not to be tried or punished for it again”

  • Section 11(h) of the Charter

Pursuant section 19(2)(b) of the Privacy Act, we have the right to access this information. In the meantime, we reserve our right to be presumed innocent on occurrence #2019-919038 in the absence of a public hearing:

Any Canadian charged with a criminal offense has the right to be presumed innocent unless proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal;

  • Section 11(d), Charter of Rights and Freedoms

We are jeopardized twice over by the Crown’s neglect of our right to a judicial review in the matter:

Definition:

double jeopardy – common-law and constitutional prohibition against a second prosecution after a first trial for the same offense.

same-evidence test – The “same-evidence test” used in determining the issue of double jeopardy is whether facts alleged in second indictment, if given in evidence, would have sustained a conviction under the first indictment or whether the same evidence would support a conviction in each case.

  • Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Edition

On October 20th of last year, we made an application in accordance with section 41 of the Privacy Act for a review where the RCMP refused us access to information #991149331. Contrary to the opinion of the Federal Court, this application was made within the 45-day timeframe allotted for such an application.

This information was obtained by a foreign entity and used to interfere with our right to stand for qualification to the House of Commons as provided by section 3 of the Charter.

As it now stands, the Crown is violating our section 11(a) Charter right to be informed of the specifics of occurrence #2019-919038 within a reasonable time. We have made representations to both the Federal and Provincial government to no avail.

Were the information publicly disclosed today (as it ought to be), we would not be required to live in a society where free expression is considered a crime. These conditions are prejudicial toward our right to mobility under section 6 of the Charter and are having a deleterious effect on our ability to maintain employment.

The Crown is unfairly burdening us with residency requirements while failing to satisfy their burden to establish that access to information #991149331 may be refused.

The Crown is neglecting our section 11(a) Charter right to be informed (within a reasonable time) of the specifics used to deprive us of our political standing:

“No free man shall be deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his peers or by the law of the territory.”

  • Clause 39, Magna Carta

In response to this violation of our constitutional right, we intend to protest in furtherance of Canadian nationalism.

Categories
Podcast

How We Know Canada Isn’t A Free Society

When constructive political debate is criminally prosecuted under the guise of “combatting hate” we know that society is neither free nor democratic.
Categories
Activism

The Facist State

Canadian Nationalist Party Ensign

Definition

“The facist state is not won by way of majority opinion or popular sentiment, but on the principle of orderliness and with the more intelligent organization of the body politic.”