Definition
“The facist state is not won by way of majority opinion or popular sentiment, but on the principle of orderliness and with the more intelligent organization of the body politic.”
Categories
The Facist State
Categories
Zionist-Occupied Canada
“Stop imprisoning our people for criticizing the Zionist lobby.”
This is our message to Saskatchewan in response to their dismissal of our appeal of a criminal “hate speech” conviction and sentence.
In June of 2019, we published a speech entitled Beware The Parasitic Tribe and maintain our right to keep this propaganda public amidst the Zionist occupation of Canada.
If the Crown requires that this material be unpublished, they must publicly disclose the information used to lay charges in the matter (occurrence #2019-919038).
This information was used to illegally de-register the Canadian Nationalist Party on March 31st, 2022.
7 years have passed since the publication of this political speech and the Province of Saskatchewan continues in their attempt to criminally prosecute us for it. The prison sentence and associated probation order have already been served. Over 100 court appearances have been made in the matter, and the Crown continues it’s absurd campaign to deceive the public into believing that this speech is a “call to genocide Jewish people” as claimed by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.
In actuality, what this is is a malicious prosecution. It is not conducted to maintain public safety but to supress the ideology of Canadian nationalism.
We do not support the Zionist cause because the promised land does not come about through armed warfare.
Categories
Canadians Are French
In 1535, French explorer Jacques Cartier mapped the Gulf of Saint Lawrence and the territory where the city of Quebec and Montreal now reside.
He is the founder of Canada and claimed it for New France. Even though these territories came into the possession of the British with the Treaty of Paris (1763), Canada maintains it’s French heritage.
In the debate surrounding Canadian nationalism, and the enhancement of national identity in Canada, one of the pivotal points of contention is that of language: are Canadians English, French, or both?
During his tenure as Prime Minister in 1970s, Pierre Trudeau enacted official bilingualism as a government policy. However, this policy is ill-conceived because a confederacy cannot occupy divergent languages. Canada must be either French or English, but it cannot be both.
What has transpired since the adoption of official bilingualism is a cultural stagnation that has been detrimental to our national character. Therefore, we must dissolve official bilingualism in favor of unilingualism.
The position of the Canadian Nationalist Party is that, not only has Canada traditionally been French, but it remains so. While the Anglophone squats on a national identity not rightfully theirs, the French are embroiled in a confederacy that largely treats their linguistic rights as an exception rather than the rule.
What we see is that Canadians are French. A person who does not speak French is not Canadian. Originally, Canadians were French Catholics – and in this faith-based identity we find the heritage of Canada.
Anglophones must develop their own sense of national identity distinct from the Francophone.
Although it may be uncomfortable, the English speaking population in Canada would be well served to admit that Canadian nationalism belongs to the French, and that they must create their own national identity based on common values.
Contrary to popular opinion, Canadian nationalism would not be served by Quebec separatism, but rather, the Anglophone declaring their independence from Canada.
Anglophones would best be served by recognizing Canadian nationalism is Francophone while working to develop their own sense of identity in accordance with English common law.
Categories
Defamatory Libel Is A Crime
Canadian Media outlets continue to report (as though fact) that the trial in the matter found he is “calling for a genocide” in the speech.
This is a defamatory libel intended to impair the ideology of Canadian nationalism by targeting the Party Leader:
“A defamatory libel is matter published, without lawful justification or excuse, that is likely to injure the reputation of any person by exposing him to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or that is designed to insult the person of or concerning whom it is published.”
– Criminal Code of Canada, section 298
Despite these circumstances, the Canadian Nationalist Party has yet to be given access to the information used to lay charges in the matter, information suspected of interfering in the Party’s ability to democratically compete in Federal Elections.
Under section 11(a) of the Charter, every Canadian citizen has the right to be informed of the specifics of the charge against them without unreasonable delay:
Any person charged with an offence has the right to be informed without unreasonable delay of the specific offence;
– section 11(a), Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
It has been approximately a decade since the Canadian Nationalist Party began participating in public affairs with the intent to nationalize our country and provide a visible opposition to the Liberal Party’s policy of transitioning Canada into the “world’s first post-national country” – something they announced in 2015.
What we have seen is that section 319 of the Criminal Code is being used to supress particular political ideologies without due process. An abuse of power is taking place where political party leaders are being targeted for their advocacy yet not afforded a fair and public trial.
Accordingly, we demand that this information used to lay charges against us under section 319 and interfere with our be publicly disclosed (information #991149331). The Crown’s neglect of our right to be informed of the nature of the offense within a reasonable time continues to impair Canadian nationalism. We do not consent to any further delay in proceedings brought under section 319 of the Criminal Code. Our speech/propaganda is not an imprisonable offense.
The defamatory coverage of these matters published by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (among other Canadian media) has been deleterious to our ability to maintain employment and personal health.
These developments continue to demonstrate that Canadian nationalism is being prejudiced by the current administration in Ottawa. With no reasonable access to democracy, we find it necessary to pursue alternative means of enforcing immigration reform when we are refused access to the information used to de-register the Canadian Nationalist Party and deprive our constituency of a democratic channel.
Given all else equal, naturalized Canadian must be given prioritized access to public property and services in order to maintain our sense of national identity (section 91(25) British North America Act (1867)).
Categories
Nothing To Be Proud Of
For the second time since my arrest in 2023, Saskatoon has caused the innocent blood of a political party leader to be spilt.
This time, the assault occurred during Saskatoon’s 2026 Pride Festival, a public endorsement of homosexuality.
I am a public advocate of Canadian nationalism and was assaulted while walking down the sidewalk showcasing the following flag:
The assault occurred in the presence of Saskatoon Police officers where bystanders affirmed that I was indeed assaulted:
Hospitalization is required for stiches:
The City of Saskatoon is notorious for neglecting the Canadian Nationalist Party’s Charter right to peaceful assembly on public property (CACV3747).
During the 43rd Federal Election, the City refused the Party (who was registered with Elections Canada at the time) permission to assemble at Civic Square in order to communicate their policies to voters and field potential candidates for Saskatoon. Despite refusing such permission, the City did grant permission to competing parties within the same time period (such as the NDP).
Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
- (c) freedom of peaceful assembly
- Section 2(c), Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
A criminal complaint has been made to the Saskatoon Police Service (file #2026-86249), but as of this writing, no charges have been laid against the suspect nor has their identity been disclosed to the victim.
During their incarceration on allegations of criminal harassment, Party Leader Travis Patron was assaulted with a weapon causing bodily harm after Saskatchewan peace officers handcuffed him behind the back then started kicking him in the face until he bled profusely. The Court of King’s Bench for Saskatchewan has since refused to make public the surveillance video capturing the incident (KBG-RG-001564-2025) and no criminal charges have been laid against the peace officer.
We are making this information public because Saskatoon is promoting same-sex relations while using violence toward those who object on conscientious grounds:
“Do not engage is sexual relations with another man as one does with a woman, for it is an act detestable to God.”
- Leviticus 18:22
We reserve our right to defend national interests to the fullest extent that Canadian law permits.
Categories
Information Should Be Free
The Province of Saskatchewan continues to withhold the information used to deprive our nation of it’s right to electoral democracy.
On Thursday, May 28th, 2026, Justice Neil Robertson of the Court of King’s Bench dismissed an application for access to information made under Saskatchewan’s Freedom of Information & Protection of Privacy Act, giving the applicant 1 day to refile the application.
The application was dismissed after correctly anticipating Saskatchewan’s continued refusal to provide access:
Despite an originating $200 fee on the application, the Registrar confirmed that if the applicant chose to refile, another fee would still need to be paid on the new application.
Maxim of Law
jus non patitur ut idem bis solvatur – The law does not require a second payment for the same thing.
Applications for judicial review where access to information #991149331 has been refused have now been dismissed with prejudice at both the federal and provincial levels. The information used to illegally de-register the Canadian Nationalist Party continues to be withheld while the Province of Saskatchewan proceeds against us with accusations of so-called “hate speech”.
Last year, the Federal Court dismissed an application made for judicial review under section 41 of the Privacy Act by neglecting to observe the Sabbath Holiday. As described by the Interpretation Act, where the deadline to file an application falls on a holiday, the application may be filed on the day following.
“Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.”
– Commissioner Pravin Lal, UN Declaration of Human Rights (Sid Meier’s Alpha Centuri, 1999)
The applicant maintains their common law right to make full answer and defence where the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation is publishing claims that our speech Beware The Parasitic Tribe is a “call for a genocide“.
Categories