My name is Travis Patron and I am the Leader of the Canadian Nationalist Party.
I am writing this entry today because, after the Supreme Court dismissed our appeal, I have been imprisoned multiple times now by the Province of Saskatchewan for nothing more than my political speech.
No violence, no threats, no profanity, no obscenity, no vulgar language and no cursing. Just simple and straightforward speech that is political in nature.
A society that respects neither an accused person’s right to habeas corpus nor their right to free expression does not in turn deserve respect. The current administration we have at the federal government is mobilizing whatever resources are at its disposal to suppress the ideology of nationalism.
They want to public to believe that breaching the topic of race and demographic change is a crime.
I believe that we, as Canadians, have the right to advocate our nationality and that we should not be imprisoned for doing so. This policy is not negotiable. We are not interested in making a compromise here: stop infringing on us simply for communicating a shared sense of national identity.
Over the past couple generations, this country has undergone a radical and unwarranted demographic change. This demographic change of a country which (as recent as 1971) was 97% European-descent has been done in bad faith. At no point have we asked for the policies that have led to this change in our national character. We have not consented to them and we did not vote for them.
Specifically, Canada should not be imprisoning its citizens for advocating the national vision our founder instilled at the time of confederacy. For the Courts to punish such a thing simply demonstrates they no longer represent Canadian interests. They cannot be relied upon to defend the cause of Canadianism as enshrined in our constitution.
The current administration in Ottawa is evidently hostile toward our nation. They intend on transitioning us into the “world’s first post-national country” as announced in 2015.
What this platform has been, and continue to be, used for is documenting the people and processes that have caused this crime against humanity – and indeed it meets the threshold as described by the Crimes Against Humanity & War Crimes Act.
Habeas Corpus, for example, is an ancient remedy for illegal imprisonment. It is enshrined in our Charter of Rights & Freedoms as well as the Bill of Rights, and is inspired by the Magna Carta of 1215. Yet this government we have today refuses to acknowledge such a common law provision.
Canadian peace officers of today are enforcing policies enacted by a Parliament that does not recognize remedy by way of habeas corpus. That in itself is shameful.
For all the talk about the “world needing more Canada”, I cannot help but think this is hypocritical. The world doesn’t need more government that suppresses it’s citizens’ national identity and illegally imprisons political candidates for their activism.
This isn’t about keeping the peace or upholding public safety. It’s about maintaining control through media manipulation and transitioning us into a “post-national” surveillance state.
If Saskatchewan peace officers truly cared about what’s best for Canada, they would stand down.
This administration maintains control by selectively disclosing/withholding information within the criminal court. Then, uses it’s media outlets to put a negative spin on the matter in order to defame and libel the accused person. The public is then impressed with the idea that the accused person committed a criminal offence when, if the evidence was made public, it would be clear that no wrongdoing even been done.
The most recent example of this is the slanderous Regina Leader-Post newspaper who, is response to the Supreme Court dismissing our application for leave to appeal, claims that I was “following an interracial couple around a Saskatoon mall and asking the man repeatedly ‘Why are you walking around with our women if you weren’t born in Canada?'”.
This is not what transpired on July 30th, 2023.
Rather, in the midst of a consensual conversation, I asked the man one time: ‘Why are you walking around with our women if you’re not born here?’. The man refused to answer the question and walked away. I did not follow the man around the mall asking him this same question “repeatedly”. This is deliberate misrepresentation of public affairs that Canadian media outlets such as the Regina Leader-Post have become notorious for.
Regardless of what the Supreme Court thinks, I maintain my innocence in the matter. We now see that this government administration is hostile to such a query. I do not appreciate being falsely accused and it seems that Saskatchewan has made a habit of this …
I did not harass anyone at the mall. I asked a fair question and I asked it one time: Why are you walking around with our women when you’re not born here?
I can understand if not everyone might agree with the premise of this question, but to imprison someone simply for asking it is wrong. During trial, the prosecution’s case fell apart, and what transpired is a prosecution that is based on the refusal to disclose exculpatory evidence in the Crown’s possession. Were the evidence in the Crown’s possession to be made fully public, the public would be shocked by the deliberate misrepresentation in this case.
Only a deranged administration would treat a political candidate as a dangerous criminal and imprison them for asking such a basic question.
I am seriously offended that the Province of Saskatchewan would go to such lengths to deprive me of my liberty and attempt to deceive the public into thinking I committed a criminal offence in the matter.