Categories
Notice

Required To Live Where Unemployed

The same administration that has deprived us of political standing is ordering us to reside in a locale that is not only anti-nationalistic, but undemocratic.

There is no democracy here.

This might not be a problem in itself, but combined with the fact that this same administration is refusing to disclose the information that has been used to de-register our Party, and deprive us of a democratic channel, it is a conflict of interest. We reserve our section 11(a) Charter right to be informed of the specifics of occurrence #2019-919038 within a reasonable time.

There is no legal channel to advocate our policies. What we see is a society that claims to be democratic, but when reason exists to demonstrate the contrary, the affected Party is maligned and ignored.

Under the treaty of Magna Carta, we are not to be deprived of our political standing except by way of judgement of our peers or by the law of Canada.

“No free man shall be deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his peers or by the law of the territory.”

  • Clause 39, Magna Carta

And in particular, the Treaty of Paris provides:

“His Britannick Majesty, on his side, agrees to grant the liberty of the Catholic religion to the inhabitants of Canada: he will, in consequence, give the most precise and most effectual orders, that his new Roman Catholic subjects may profess the worship of their religion according to the rites of the Romish church, as far as the laws of Great Britain permit.”

– Article 4, Treaty Of Paris (February 10th, 1763)

So while Saskatchewan treats our profession as a crime (Beware The Parasitic Tribe), they are required to inform the accused of the information used to proceed against them, and to do so within a reasonable time (RCMP file #P-2025-00838).

The Crown has since neglected our right under the Privacy Act to a judicial review in the matter. This delay in acknowledging our right to access the information used to de-register the Canadian Nationalist Party is causing the ideology of nationalism to be excluded from society.

Therefore, we intend to protest the continued infringement of our mobility rights as provided by section 6 of the Charter.

If the Crown is going to restrict our access to public property, we will (in return) nationalize Crown property.

Categories
Statement

Bodily Harm Disputed

On June 22nd, 2022, Crown Prosecutor Ryan Snyder presented fabricated evidence to a jury in order to substantiate their claim that I caused bodily harm to women in Regina (Information #991153654).

The fabrication consisted of photographic evidence depicting bruising and swelling to the complainant (Exhibit P-1). However, the injuries show to the jury in this photograph were digitally manufactured.

Upon objection from the accused, Justice Klatt refused further examination of the fabricated photograph.

The complainant(s) testified that they were “slapped”, but the injuries depicted in the photograph were not even on the side of the face the complainant(s) were slapped.

According to the complainant(s) statement, they were able to (eventually) confirm at the hospital that their arm “wasn’t broken”.

The accused maintains that this presentation of fabricated evidence to the jury demonstrates the prosecution was conducted maliciously (as stated at trial) and with the aim of discrediting Canadian nationalism. We also maintain that (as a result of this malicious prosecution) more harm has been done to Canadian interests than the accused has caused any victim.

Fabricating Evidence
Every one who, with intent to mislead, fabricates anything with intent that it shall be used as evidence in a judicial proceeding, existing or proposed, by any means other than perjury or incitement to perjury is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

  • Section 137, Criminal Code

The exhibit shown to the jury was digitally edited to substantiate the claim of bodily harm.

Definition:
bodily harm means any hurt or injury to a person that interferes with the health or comfort of the person and that is more than merely transient or trifling in nature;

  • section 2, Criminal Code

The Crown originally laid charges under section 268, claiming that the accused “maimed” the complainant (Information #991111114(2)), but later reduced these charges to section 267 assault causing bodily harm.

The accused maintains that the verdict returned by the jury was a result of fabricated evidence.

What we see in Saskatchewan is a prosecution that is oriented toward damaging Canadian nationalism rather than ensuring the accused person is provided a fair trial as required by law.

The copies of this photograph disclosed to the accused are significantly different than that which was shown to the jury. However, the accused was unable to rebut the claim of bodily harm because the original photograph was inaccessible to them while incarcerated.

The names of the complainant(s) have not been published here for discretionary purposes.

Categories
Activism

Double Jeopardized

Once again, the Province of Saskatchewan is attempting to criminally proceed against us in response to our political speech Beware The Parasitic Tribe. However, the Crown has yet to provide us a public hearing in the matter as the information used to de-register the Canadian Nationalist Party remains undisclosed.

For those who have bothered to listen, I have been raising this objection for several years now.

Proceedings in criminal and penal matters

“Any Canadian charged with a criminal offense has the right, if finally found guilty and punished for the offence, not to be tried or punished for it again”

  • Section 11(h) of the Charter

Pursuant section 19(2)(b) of the Privacy Act, we have the right to access this information. In the meantime, we reserve our right to be presumed innocent on occurrence #2019-919038 in the absence of a public hearing:

Any Canadian charged with a criminal offense has the right to be presumed innocent unless proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal;

  • Section 11(d), Charter of Rights and Freedoms

We are jeopardized twice over by the Crown’s neglect of our right to a judicial review in the matter:

Definition:

double jeopardy – common-law and constitutional prohibition against a second prosecution after a first trial for the same offense.

same-evidence test – The “same-evidence test” used in determining the issue of double jeopardy is whether facts alleged in second indictment, if given in evidence, would have sustained a conviction under the first indictment or whether the same evidence would support a conviction in each case.

  • Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Edition

On October 20th of last year, we made an application in accordance with section 41 of the Privacy Act for a review where the RCMP refused us access to information #991149331. Contrary to the opinion of the Federal Court, this application was made within the 45-day timeframe allotted for such an application.

This information was obtained by a foreign entity and used to interfere with our right to stand for qualification to the House of Commons as provided by section 3 of the Charter.

As it now stands, the Crown is violating our section 11(a) Charter right to be informed of the specifics of occurrence #2019-919038 within a reasonable time. We have made representations to both the Federal and Provincial government to no avail.

Were the information publicly disclosed today (as it ought to be), we would not be required to live in a society where free expression is considered a crime. These conditions are prejudicial toward our right to mobility under section 6 of the Charter and are having a deleterious effect on our ability to maintain employment.

The Crown is unfairly burdening us with residency requirements while failing to satisfy their burden to establish that access to information #991149331 may be refused.

The Crown is neglecting our section 11(a) Charter right to be informed (within a reasonable time) of the specifics used to deprive us of our political standing:

“No free man shall be deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his peers or by the law of the territory.”

  • Clause 39, Magna Carta

In response to this violation of our constitutional right, we intend to protest in furtherance of Canadian nationalism.

Categories
Podcast

How We Know Canada Isn’t A Free Society

When constructive political debate is criminally prosecuted under the guise of “combatting hate” we know that society is neither free nor democratic.
Categories
Activism

The Facist State

Ensign of the Canadian Nationalist Party (Commissioned September, 2022)

Definition

“The facist state is not won by way of majority opinion or popular sentiment, but on the principle of orderliness and with the more intelligent organization of the body politic.”

Categories
Statement

Zionist-Occupied Canada

“Stop imprisoning our people for criticizing the Zionist lobby.”

This is our message to Saskatchewan in response to their dismissal of our appeal of a criminal “hate speech” conviction and sentence.

In June of 2019, we published a speech entitled Beware The Parasitic Tribe and maintain our right to keep this propaganda public amidst the Zionist occupation of Canada.

If the Crown requires that this material be unpublished, they must publicly disclose the information used to lay charges in the matter (occurrence #2019-919038).

This information was used to illegally de-register the Canadian Nationalist Party on March 31st, 2022.

7 years have passed since the publication of this political speech and the Province of Saskatchewan continues in their attempt to criminally prosecute us for it. The prison sentence and associated probation order have already been served. Over 100 court appearances have been made in the matter, and the Crown continues it’s absurd campaign to deceive the public into believing that this speech is a “call to genocide Jewish people” as claimed by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.

In actuality, what this is is a malicious prosecution. It is not conducted to maintain public safety but to supress the ideology of Canadian nationalism.

We do not support the Zionist cause because the promised land does not come about through armed warfare.

Categories
Podcast

Canadians Are French

The responsibility is not on Québéc to separate from Canada, but the Anglophone to do so by creating an independent national identity.

In 1535, French explorer Jacques Cartier mapped the Gulf of Saint Lawrence and the territory where the city of Quebec and Montreal now reside (les Canadas).

He is the founder of Canada and claimed it for New France. Even though these territories came into the possession of the British with the Treaty of Paris (1763), Canada maintains it’s French heritage.

Map of Canada (Samuel Champlain, 1613)

In the debate surrounding Canadian nationalism, and the enhancement of national identity in Canada, one of the pivotal points of contention is that of language: are Canadians English, French, or both?

During his tenure as Prime Minister in 1970s, Pierre Trudeau enacted official bilingualism as a government policy. However, this policy is ill-conceived because a confederacy cannot occupy divergent languages. Canada must be either French or English, but it cannot be both.

What has transpired since the adoption of official bilingualism is a cultural stagnation that has been detrimental to our national character. Therefore, we must dissolve official bilingualism in favor of unilingualism.

The position of the Canadian Nationalist Party is that, not only has Canada traditionally been French, but it remains so. While the Anglophone squats on a national identity not rightfully theirs, the French are embroiled in a confederacy that largely treats their linguistic rights as an exception rather than the rule.

Definition:
squat – (1) unlawfully occupy an uninhabited building or area of land (2) a property acquired by squatters

What we see is that Canadians are French. A person who is not French cannot be Canadian. Originally, Canadians were French Catholics – and in this faith-based identity we find the heritage of Canada.

Anglophones must develop their own sense of national identity distinct from the Francophone.

Although it may be uncomfortable, the English speaking population in Canada would be well served to admit that Canadian nationalism belongs to the French, and that they must create their own national identity based on common values.

Contrary to popular opinion, Canadian nationalism would not be served by Quebec separatism (nor the continued merger of French and English interests into a common confederacy), but rather, the Anglophone declaring their independence from Canada.

Anglophones would best be served by recognizing Canadian nationalism is Francophone while working to develop their own sense of identity in accordance with English common law.