Categories
Podcast

Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied

The Government of Canada continues to malign the Canadian Nationalist Party by prosecuting it’s Leader while unconstitutionally withholding the information used to lay charges:

Legal Rights
“Any person charged with an offence has the right to be informed without unreasonable delay of the specific offence;”

  • Section 11(a), Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

We have been applying for a copy of the information used to lay charges against us under section 319 since 2021. This information has been used to commit elections fraud by impersonating the Canadian Nationalist Party during the course of the 44th Federal Election, a violation of section 402.2(2) of the Criminal Code.

We are now almost in 2027 and not only have we not received a judicial review of this matter, but the RCMP continues to proceed against us on accusations that our speech entitled Beware The Parasitic Tribe is a criminal liability.

We have not been provided a fair trial. We have been subject to a malicious prosecution that is designed to impair the political ideology of nationalism in the face of the Liberal Party’s call to transition Canada into the “world’s first post-national country”.

An application under section 41 of the Privacy Act for a judicial review was made in October of 2025. If the integrity of Canada’s democratic system was a priority, the refusal to provide us access to the information would have been judicially reviewed by now.

If and when this matter is finally reviewed, we will demonstrate that foreign interference has undermined Canada’s democratic process. Until then, the Crown would like the public to believe that Travis Patron is no longer a federal political party leader.

The delay in reviewing these matters has exceeded what is reasonable in the matter.

While the information is being withheld, the Crown is taking full advantage of the precarious situation they themselves have created for the accused.

“To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay right or justice.”

  • Clause 40, Magna Carta

Instead the accused person is being blackmailed by the non-disclosure of evidence they are entitled to.

Categories
Podcast

How We Know Canada Isn’t A Free Society

When constructive political debate is criminally prosecuted under the guise of “combatting hate” we know that society is neither free nor democratic.
Categories
Podcast

Canadians Are French

The responsibility is not on Québéc to separate from Canada, but the Anglophone to do so by creating an independent national identity.

In 1535, French explorer Jacques Cartier mapped the Gulf of Saint Lawrence and the territory where the city of Quebec and Montreal now reside (les Canadas).

He is the founder of Canada and claimed it for New France. Even though these territories came into the possession of the British with the Treaty of Paris (1763), Canada maintains it’s French heritage.

Map of Canada (Samuel Champlain, 1613)

In the debate surrounding Canadian nationalism, and the enhancement of national identity in Canada, one of the pivotal points of contention is that of language: are Canadians English, French, or both?

During his tenure as Prime Minister in 1970s, Pierre Trudeau enacted official bilingualism as a government policy. However, this policy is ill-conceived because a confederacy cannot occupy divergent languages. Canada must be either French or English, but it cannot be both.

What has transpired since the adoption of official bilingualism is a cultural stagnation that has been detrimental to our national character. Therefore, we must dissolve official bilingualism in favor of unilingualism.

The position of the Canadian Nationalist Party is that, not only has Canada traditionally been French, but it remains so. While the Anglophone squats on a national identity not rightfully theirs, the French are embroiled in a confederacy that largely treats their linguistic rights as an exception rather than the rule.

Definition:
squat – (1) unlawfully occupy an uninhabited building or area of land (2) a property acquired by squatters

What we see is that Canadians are French. A person who is not French cannot be Canadian. Originally, Canadians were French Catholics – and in this faith-based identity we find the heritage of Canada.

Anglophones must develop their own sense of national identity distinct from the Francophone.

Although it may be uncomfortable, the English speaking population in Canada would be well served to admit that Canadian nationalism belongs to the French, and that they must create their own national identity based on common values.

Contrary to popular opinion, Canadian nationalism would not be served by Quebec separatism (nor the continued merger of French and English interests into a common confederacy), but rather, the Anglophone declaring their independence from Canada.

Anglophones would best be served by recognizing Canadian nationalism is Francophone while working to develop their own sense of identity in accordance with English common law.

Categories
Podcast

Information Should Be Free

At both the federal and provincial level now, our call for a judicial review of suspected foreign interference in Canadian democracy has been neglected.

The Province of Saskatchewan continues to withhold the information used to deprive our nation of it’s right to electoral democracy.

On Thursday, May 28th, 2026, Justice Neil Robertson of the Court of King’s Bench dismissed an application for access to information made under Saskatchewan’s Freedom of Information & Protection of Privacy Act, giving the applicant 1 day to refile the application.

The application was dismissed after correctly anticipating Saskatchewan’s continued refusal to provide access:

Despite an originating $200 fee on the application, the Registrar confirmed that if the applicant chose to refile, another fee would still need to be paid on the new application.

Maxim of Law
jus non patitur ut idem bis solvatur – The law does not require a second payment for the same thing.

Applications for judicial review where access to information #991149331 has been refused have now been dismissed with prejudice at both the federal and provincial levels. The information used to illegally de-register the Canadian Nationalist Party continues to be withheld while the Province of Saskatchewan proceeds against us with accusations of so-called “hate speech”.

Last year, the Federal Court dismissed an application made for judicial review under section 41 of the Privacy Act by neglecting to observe the Sabbath Holiday. As described by the Interpretation Act, where the deadline to file an application falls on a holiday, the application may be filed on the day following.

“Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.”

– Commissioner Pravin Lal, UN Declaration of Human Rights (Sid Meier’s Alpha Centuri, 1999)

The applicant maintains their common law right to make full answer and defence where the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation is publishing claims that our speech Beware The Parasitic Tribe is a “call for a genocide“.

Categories
Podcast

[Ep. #40] Untying The Knot

The adversary has tied a knot by putting our people into a seemingly contradictory ideological position. On the one hand, we support the Christian faith, but on the otherhand, the identity of Israel has been co-opted.
Categories
Podcast

[Ep. #39] Full & Frank Disclosure

This is an update regarding the ongoing matters between myself and the Crown where the prosecution continues to without disclosure in an attempt to prejudice the accused’s right to a fair trial.
Categories
Podcast

Reasonable Access To Democracy

In order to make full answer and defense (section 8(3) Criminal Code) to the charges pending in Court between Travis Patron and His Majesty The King (R v Patron), we require reasonable access to a democratic society as “guaranteed” by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.