Categories
Category: Podcast
An archive of Canadian Nationalist Podcast episodes (March 20th, 2026 – present).
Categories
Canadians Are French
In 1535, French explorer Jacques Cartier mapped the Gulf of Saint Lawrence and the territory where the city of Quebec and Montreal now reside.
He is the founder of Canada and claimed it for New France. Even though these territories came into the possession of the British with the Treaty of Paris (1763), Canada maintains it’s French heritage.
In the debate surrounding Canadian nationalism, and the enhancement of national identity in Canada, one of the pivotal points of contention is that of language: are Canadians English, French, or both?
During his tenure as Prime Minister in 1970s, Pierre Trudeau enacted official bilingualism as a government policy. However, this policy is ill-conceived because a confederacy cannot occupy divergent languages. Canada must be either French or English, but it cannot be both.
What has transpired since the adoption of official bilingualism is a cultural stagnation that has been detrimental to our national character. Therefore, we must dissolve official bilingualism in favor of unilingualism.
The position of the Canadian Nationalist Party is that, not only has Canada traditionally been French, but it remains so. While the Anglophone squats on a national identity not rightfully theirs, the French are embroiled in a confederacy that largely treats their linguistic rights as an exception rather than the rule.
What we see is that Canadians are French. A person who does not speak French is not Canadian. Originally, Canadians were French Catholics – and in this faith-based identity we find the heritage of Canada.
Anglophones must develop their own sense of national identity distinct from the Francophone.
Although it may be uncomfortable, the English speaking population in Canada would be well served to admit that Canadian nationalism belongs to the French, and that they must create their own national identity based on common values.
Contrary to popular opinion, Canadian nationalism would not be served by Quebec separatism, but rather, the Anglophone declaring their independence from Canada.
Anglophones would best be served by recognizing Canadian nationalism is Francophone while working to develop their own sense of identity in accordance with English common law.
Categories
Information Should Be Free
The Province of Saskatchewan continues to withhold the information used to deprive our nation of it’s right to electoral democracy.
On Thursday, May 28th, 2026, Justice Neil Robertson of the Court of King’s Bench dismissed an application for access to information made under Saskatchewan’s Freedom of Information & Protection of Privacy Act, giving the applicant 1 day to refile the application.
The application was dismissed after correctly anticipating Saskatchewan’s continued refusal to provide access:
Despite an originating $200 fee on the application, the Registrar confirmed that if the applicant chose to refile, another fee would still need to be paid on the new application.
Maxim of Law
jus non patitur ut idem bis solvatur – The law does not require a second payment for the same thing.
Applications for judicial review where access to information #991149331 has been refused have now been dismissed with prejudice at both the federal and provincial levels. The information used to illegally de-register the Canadian Nationalist Party continues to be withheld while the Province of Saskatchewan proceeds against us with accusations of so-called “hate speech”.
Last year, the Federal Court dismissed an application made for judicial review under section 41 of the Privacy Act by neglecting to observe the Sabbath Holiday. As described by the Interpretation Act, where the deadline to file an application falls on a holiday, the application may be filed on the day following.
“Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.”
– Commissioner Pravin Lal, UN Declaration of Human Rights (Sid Meier’s Alpha Centuri, 1999)
The applicant maintains their common law right to make full answer and defence where the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation is publishing claims that our speech Beware The Parasitic Tribe is a “call for a genocide“.
Categories
[Ep. #40] Untying The Knot
Categories
[Ep. #39] Full & Frank Disclosure
Categories
Reasonable Access To Democracy
Categories