It is through our policies and vision of a better way of life that we will form a majority government by uniting the hearts and minds of Canadians.
Former Canadian Nationalist Party candidate Gus Sefanis has been discharged and is no longer active with the organization. Stefanis ran in the Scarborough-Guildwood district during the recent 43rd Federal Election.
This decision was made Wednesday, July 29th, and is only today being made public.
We wish him the very best with his future endeavors.
*Update: Party Leader Travis Patron has submitted this petition to the local municipality. You can read about it here: Patron Submits Petition To Redvers Town Council
The Canadian Nationalist Party is forming a petition to discontinue publicly promoting homosexuality within the municipality of Redvers and the larger federal jurisdiction.
We are forming this petition in the belief that this type of development (the utilization of public utilities/finances to promote homosexuality) may not be in the best interests of our community and are concerned that the Town Of Redvers’ decision to approve a LGBTQ2+ crosswalk will further inflame an already contentious issue.
If you are someone who supports discontinuing the public promotion of homosexuality within our community, we encourage you to add your signature to this petition. Please call +1(306) 700-2193 to add your signature.
In September of 2019, Party Leader Travis Patron submitted a Letter of Complaint to the Town Council Of Redvers in response to recent approval to use public utilities to promote homosexuality.
NOTE: At this time, the Canadian Nationalist Party will only be accepting signatures from residents of the municipality of Redvers in regard to the proceeds of this petition.
Travis Patron
Leader of the Canadian Nationalist Party | +1(306) 700-2193 | www.nationalist.ca
A Letter From Our Leader:
Other than the National Citizens Alliance, the Canadian Nationalist Party (CNP) is the only federally registered party headquartered in all of Western Canada. Even though not everyone may agree with us, this is a platform we can use to our advantage if we are smart about it, keep an open channel of dialogue, and are willing to work for success.
Today we are making an appeal to the community for the benefit of the doubt (when there is a known unknown, assume honesty) in the belief that, despite all the evidence to the contrary, the Canadian Nationalist Party is our best outlet for federal representation.
Given that the Liberal Government recently bypassed parliamentary proceedings entirely to call for the confiscation of firearms from law-abiding Canadians, it may be wise to assume there will not be another general election in Canada. There may not be another opportunity to register new federal parties with Elections Canada, as it requires nominating candidates in a general or by-election.
Recall how the entire province of Saskatchewan voted in one particular direction (Conservative) during the recent 43rd Federal Election and basically nothing whatsoever has changed. This is because the Conservative Party is impotent when it comes to implementing the change our country needs.
We must do everything in our power to ensure the CNP remains in good standing with the community, otherwise we will diminish our ability to advocate for ourselves. We are a party who has the nationhood of our country at heart. We understand that our challenge is an uphill one. However, no longer can we allow ourselves to be intimidated into thinking that advocating our ethnic interests is immoral or wrong – it is not, but rather, entirely normal and natural. If we fail, the sovereignty of Canada will be overtaken by an unaccountable, unelected, globalist form of government where citizens are under constant surveillance and the State does not recognize individual freedoms or constitutional rights we often take for granted. Our country will continue to move in a direction which is similar to current-day China (communism).
We must oppose this! Doing nothing is a choice!
We ask those curious about our party to always go directly to our website (type ‘www.nationalist.ca’ into your web browser) in order to conduct research, not through social media, a search engine, or privately-owned media company. The mainstream media in Canada has moved entirely away from impartial coverage and toward a completely one-sided narrative of public affairs. This is not journalism. It is propaganda.
Currently, the leadership of the Canadian Nationalist Party is facing accusations stemming from the Provincial Court Of Saskatchewan. Quite likely, the only way we will succeed is with support from the community. Therefore, we are asking for the benefit of the doubt with the assurance that the party proceed with honesty, integrity, and in good faith.
Signed,
The Canadian Nationalist Party is submitting a formal complaint to the office of the CBC Ombudsman alleging a violation of their stated mandate of Journalistic Standards and Practices – code of ethics and practice.
TO:
CBC Ombudsman
P.O. Box 500 Station A
Toronto, Ontario M5W 1E6
Phone: 416-205-2978
Email: ombud@cbc.ca
FROM:
Travis Patron
Canadian Nationalist Party Inc.
Office of the Ombudsman,
We are writing you today to file a formal complaint on the grounds that the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) is failing to uphold its journalistic mandate of providing “fairness, balance, impartiality and integrity” in its coverage of matters of public interest. Further to the mandate, CBC is failing to “inform, to reveal, to contribute to the understanding” of Canadian citizens to “participate in our free and democratic society”. The mandate additionally states that CBC is basing their credibility on “fulfilling that mission through adherence to the values, principles and practices laid out in the Journalistic Standards and Practices“. Let this complaint be considered an expression of dissatisfaction with CBC’s impartiality, fairness, and integrity as it relates to program management and investigative reporting affecting our democratic proceedings.
In February of this year we submitted a report entitled ‘The Emperor Wears No Clothes‘ through your SecureDrop web portal and have yet to receive any response whatsoever. This report detailed information about how the constitutional rights of our federal political party were violated in order to suppress our ability to compete in the recent 43rd Federal Election.
Without a single exception, our federally-sanctioned party has been prohibited from obtaining a public permit or from hosting a public event at institutions which our tax dollars fund. These requests to utilize public resources and exercise our constitutional rights has been violated consistently and without reason, including after the drop of the writ during the 43rd Federal Election as we were actively nominating candidates. This exclusion of our political party from public spaces and publicly-funded venues has directly affected our ability to both nominate candidates and inform the voters of our policies.
After we filed a complaint alleging our rights under the Canada Elections Act and Charter Of Rights And Freedoms have been infringed and our ability to communicate policies and nominate candidates has been violated during the recent 43rd Federal Election, the Office of the Commissioner of Canada Elections opened a formal review.
Office of the Ombudsman, I invite you to read our initial request to be permitted to “host a public event to communicate our party policies to Canadian voters for the upcoming 43rd Federal Election” followed by the response from the City Of Saskatoon:
Read the initial request: Canadian Nationalist Party Request – September 24th
Read the response: City Of Saskatoon Response – September 27th
It is important to note that the City Of Saskatoon has denied a similar request from our organization on 3 separate occasions.
Also in February of this year, the Canadian Nationalist Party filed a civil lawsuit against the City Of Saskatoon alleging a violation of constitutional rights on these exact grounds. Despite objecting to the Government Of Saskatchewan’s declaration of emergency, we have been informed our application is not proceeding through the courts until the declaration has been lifted.
The CBC’s coverage of our movement thus far does not give the impression of impartiality whatsoever, but rather dedicated to compiling negatively-oriented information about our political party in an attempt to discredit us:
If the CBC is willing to publish a story as frivolous and speculative as alleging an intellectual property violation, surely a story regarding that same federal party not being permitted to assemble and communicate policies to voters after the drop of the writ is something worth covering.
The recent 43rd Federal Election has fundamentally demonstrated that our right to self-determination, as Canadian Nationalists, is being suppressed by the current administration. Under these circumstances, our ability to assemble publicly and speak our policies to Canadian voters has, and continues to be, denied to us.
Office of the Ombudsman, may I remind you that CBC is a publicly-funded media broadcaster, and that Canadian taxpayers expect your organization to cover issues of public interest and importance – especially as it pertains to the electoral and democratic proceedings of our government administration.
Given that during our most recent exchange, you stated that your office is one “built on the value of transparency”, we assume you will have no objection to us publicizing this complaint.
To ignore such a blatant violation of our democratic proceedings and constitutional rights as Canadians represents a willful abandonment of the journalistic code of ethics and practice.
Signed,
TO:
Subjects of English Constitutional Law
FROM:
Travis Patron
Canadian Nationalist Party Inc.
DATE SERVED: May 9th, 2020
Subjects of English Constitutional Law,
This is a notice of self-representation in regards to the following alleged offenses which currently lay before Mr. Travis Patron, leader and member of our political constituency:
• [Section 266(b) CC];
• [Section 268(1) CC];
• [Section 733.1(1);
• [Section 145(3).
On November 27th, 2019, the Canadian Nationalist Party petitioned the Crown requesting the establishment of an extrajudicial tribunal capable of settling criminal and civil liabilities on behalf of our constituency. As there has thus far been a failure to respond to this petition which was made to The Crown, we take it to mean that there exists no outstanding objection to this intention.
The prosecuting authority which originally brought forth the charges has failed to provide full disclosure to the accused. The accused has thus far appeared in court on 7 separate occasions without being served full disclosure. Disclosure, which has been in the possession of the prosecuting authority at the time charges were originally lain, has been withheld from the accused for half a year. Failure to provide the accused of disclosure, without delay, may violate their constitutional right to a fair trial. Evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the accused constitutional rights must be excluded from use in a court of law. Therefore, we ask The Crown to serve the accused full disclosure of evidence immediately and without additional delay.
In accordance with the treaty of Magna Carta, which was sealed by King John of England in the year 1215 at Runnymede, and successfully invoked on March 23rd, 2001, we ask all levels of government in Canada (federal, provincial, & municipal) to honour our notice of self-representation and our request to settle these alleged offenses under the authority of our court and our political jurisdiction. All subjects of The Crown must, by Royal Command abide by constitutional law embodied in the Magna Carta, which supersedes Statutes and Acts sanctified by Parliament.
The Crown must uphold the following constitutional provisions which embody the Supreme Law of the realm:
The above affirmations and claims are valid as to our lawful understanding, and which are sworn by on penalty of perjury and commercial liability (March 3rd, 2020).
With God as our witness, and in recognizing the principal of justice enshrined as stare decisis, we agree to proceed in good faith – lawfully, honourably, and truthfully – else the administration may be called into disrepute.
In putting Subjects of English Constitutional Law on public notice of our standing, with the intent to prevent any breach of peace, we request, as obliged, prompt acknowledgement or objection of this notice including any undue consideration.
Signed,
The Canadian Nationalist Party is continuing to issue tax receipts for those who have generously donated to the party. These receipts can be used to claim a tax credit due to the fact the CNP is a federally-registered party.
To make a donation: Party Donation
All Canadians are eligible to receive generous tax credits when they donate to the Canadian Nationalist Party. The size of donation determines the tax credit available.
If you have already made a contribution this year, please use the table below to calculate your cumulative tax credit.
Only Canadian citizens or permanent residents may make political contributions, in each of the following amounts:
For more information about tax credits please visit the Canada Revenue Agency website and for more information about contribution limits, please visit Elections Canada.
*Disclaimer: The following is a declaration served on April 28th, 2020 to the municipality of Redvers, district of Souris – Moose Mountain, Province Of Saskatchewan, and Dominion Of Canada.
Fellow Canadians,
We are gathered here today declaring the lawful formation of a Common Law Tribunal in accordance with our constitutional rights embodied in the Magna Carta of 1215, which was successfully invoked on March 23rd, 2001, and sworn on by our political constituency on March 3rd, 2020. With God as our witness, and as a declaration calling on the assistance of the community in asserting Natural Justice and Due Process, we swear to do everything in our power to proceed with this Common Law Tribunal lawfully, honourably, and truthfully.
When one of you has a grievance against another, does he dare go to law before the unrighteous instead of the saints? Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world is to be judged by you, are you incompetent to try trivial cases? Do you not know that we are to judge angels? How much more, then, matters pertaining to this life! So if you have such cases, why do you lay them before those who have no standing in the church? I say this to your shame. Can it be that there is no one among you wise enough to settle a dispute between the brothers, but brother goes to law against brother, and that before unbelievers? To have lawsuits at all with one another is already a defeat for you. Why not rather suffer wrong? Why not rather be defrauded? But you yourselves wrong and defraud—even your own brothers! Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God. – 1 Corinthians 6, Lawsuits Among Believers
As an additional lawful precedent for establishing a Common Law Tribunal under the dominion of our federal political constituency, we reference Aboriginal Sentencing Circles, which are used throughout Canada for the purposes of restorative justice, and rehabilitating the offender to avoid recidivism and reoffense:
Sentencing circles have been used in much of the country, mostly at the provincial/territorial court level, in minor criminal cases involving Aboriginal offenders and their victims. Various Supreme Court of Canada decisions have interpreted changes to the Criminal Code that instructed courts to consider alternative sentences for all offenders, and to pay particular attention to the circumstances of Aboriginal offenders. The Supreme Court found that sentencing judges must examine the unique factors which may have played a part in bringing a particular Aboriginal offender before the courts, and the types of available sanctions and sentencing procedures (including sentencing circles) which may be appropriate in light of the offender’s Aboriginal heritage or identity. – Alternative Approaches, Canada’s Court System
On November 27th, 2019, we the Canadian Nationalist Party, petitioned the Crown, requesting the establishment of an extrajudicial tribunal capable of settling criminal and civil liabilities on behalf of our constituency. These proceedings, as originally proposed, would be conducted transparently in order to ensure the highest standards of equity, fairness, and respect for the rule of law. As we originally proposed, the intention of this extrajudicial organization would be to ease the burden of an already delayed court system, protect the rights of Canadians to a fair trial, and to uphold the rule of law – in recognition that no one is above the law and that every person must be held accountable for their actions lest the administration of justice be brought into disrepute.
As there has thus far been a failure to respond to this petition which was made to the Crown, we take it to mean that there exists no outstanding objection to this intention. In accordance with our constitutional rights as embodied in the Magna Carta, which remains as binding upon the Crown today as the day it was sealed at Runnymede on the fifteenth day of June in the seventeenth year of the reign of King John of England, we do hereby declare the lawful formation of a Common Law Tribunal under this treaty in conduct of justice enshrined as stare decisis.
These Common Law judicial provisions include, but are not limited to, the following:
We pledge to save from harm The Throne, The Queen, and Her Heirs. We will not sell, nor deny, nor delay right or justice to anyone. The Crown cannot proceed against any freeman, or send others to do so, except according to the lawful sentence of their peers and according to the Common Law. A freeman is not to be amerced for a small offence except in proportion to the nature of the offence, and for a great offence he is to be amerced in accordance with its magnitude, saving to him his livelihood, and a merchant in the same manner, saving to him his stock in trade, and a villein is to be amerced in the same manner, saving to him his growing crops, if they fall into our mercy. And none of the aforesaid amercements is to be imposed except by the oath of trustworthy men of the locality. If anyone has been disseized or dispossessed by the Crown, without lawful judgment of their peers, of lands, castles, liberties, or of their right, it is to be restored to them immediately. And if dispute should arise concerning this, then it is to be dealt with by judgment of the original ‘Committee Of Twenty-Five Barons’ in the security for peace.
All citizens of the realm have a lawful duty to recognize this treaty until the Crown has made redress. Those who fail to honour the treaty of Magna Carta may be held criminally liable for aiding and abetting High Treason.
The above affirmations and claims are valid as to our lawful understanding, and which are sworn by on penalty of perjury and commercial liability.
In putting subjects of the British Crown on public notice of our standing in law, with the intent to prevent any breach of peace, we request, as lawfully obliged, prompt acknowledgement or objection of this notice including any undue consideration.
The wheel of justice must continue to turn – and it will do so under our Common Law Tribunal.
Signed,
