Category: Activism

Once again, the Province of Saskatchewan is attempting to criminally proceed against us in response to our political speech Beware The Parasitic Tribe. However, the Crown has yet to provide us a public hearing in the matter as the information used to de-register the Canadian Nationalist Party remains undisclosed.

For those who have bothered to listen, I have been raising this objection for several years now.

Proceedings in criminal and penal matters

“Any Canadian charged with a criminal offense has the right, if finally found guilty and punished for the offence, not to be tried or punished for it again”

• Section 11(h) of the Charter

Pursuant section 19(2)(b) of the Privacy Act, we have the right to access this information. In the meantime, we reserve our right to be presumed innocent on occurrence #2019-919038 in the absence of a public hearing:

Any Canadian charged with a criminal offense has the right to be presumed innocent unless proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal;

• Section 11(d), Charter of Rights and Freedoms

We are jeopardized twice over by the Crown’s neglect of our right to a judicial review in the matter:

Definition:

double jeopardy – common-law and constitutional prohibition against a second prosecution after a first trial for the same offense.

same-evidence test – The “same-evidence test” used in determining the issue of double jeopardy is whether facts alleged in second indictment, if given in evidence, would have sustained a conviction under the first indictment or whether the same evidence would support a conviction in each case.

• Black’s Law Dictionary, 5^th Edition

On October 20^th of last year, we made an application in accordance with section 41 of the Privacy Act for a review where the RCMP refused us access to information #991149331. Contrary to the opinion of the Federal Court, this application was made within the 45-day timeframe allotted for such an application.

This information was obtained by a foreign entity and used to interfere with our right to stand for qualification to the House of Commons as provided by section 3 of the Charter.

As it now stands, the Crown is violating our section 11(a) Charter right to be informed of the specifics of occurrence #2019-919038 within a reasonable time. We have made representations to both the Federal and Provincial government to no avail.

Were the information publicly disclosed today (as it ought to be), we would not be required to live in a society where free expression is considered a crime. These conditions are prejudicial toward our right to mobility under section 6 of the Charter and are having a deleterious effect on our ability to maintain employment.

The Crown is unfairly burdening us with residency requirements while failing to satisfy their burden to establish that access to information #991149331 may be refused.

The Crown is neglecting our section 11(a) Charter right to be informed (within a reasonable time) of the specifics used to deprive us of our political standing:

“No free man shall be deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his peers or by the law of the territory.”

• Clause 39, Magna Carta

In response to this violation of our constitutional right, we intend to protest in furtherance of Canadian nationalism.

Recently, the Government of Canada codified Holocaust denial as a criminal offence under section 319 of the Criminal Code.

However, this legislation is unconstitutional on the face of it (prima face) because the claim that Germany committed a Holocaust has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

In light of the 1991 Zundel trial before the Supreme Court, the Crown has not satisfied its burden to prove that Germany ever committed a Holocaust because the evidence tendered in that trial, and the decision resulting from it, has not been refuted.

The decision rendered during the Zundel trial is the most relevant to Canada’s Holocaust claim. No other decision speaks to the allegation of a Holocaust in the way the Zundel trial has done:

“Even as of this writing, Zundel and the revisionist cause remain a subject of front page attention and comment in Canada. Try as they might to exorcise the phantom of this indefatigable sign of contradiction and stalwart defiance, Zundel and revisionism have had an indelible impact which bodes ill for the inquisitors, whose megalomania instigated what Noam Chomsky called the “disgrace” of arresting and trying a dissident publisher.”

• Michael A. Hoffman, The Great Holocaust Trial (1995)

Now, after quietly including this legislation in a budgeting bill, the Crown has begun using it to criminally proceed against Canadians.

Willful Promotion of Anti-Semitism
Everyone who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes antisemitism by condoning, denying or downplaying the Holocaust

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or

(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.

• Section 319(2.1), Criminal Code

Saskatoon Police Service recently charged Brandon Taylor Moore under section 319 for allegedly “condoning, denying, or downplaying the Holocaust”. He was arrested and released from custody on December 18^th and now faces court conditions prohibiting him from publishing the evidence against him.

He is next scheduled to appear on February 24^th.

The City of Saskatoon should not forget that their enforcement of this legislation is, in part, predicated upon their infringement of our section 2(c) Charter right to peacefully assemble during the 43^rd Federal Election:

1. Civic Square Booking Request – 43rd Federal Election (September 24th, 2019)
2. City of Saskatoon Response (September 27th, 2019)

It is possible to conceive that, had the Canadian Nationalist Party been permitted to make democratic use of Civic Square (as per our request), Holocaust denial would never have been codified as a criminal offense and Canadians would not be being tried on such allegations (Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan, CACV3747).

Instead, what we have is an apparent conflict of interest …

Therefore, if the City of Saskatoon is proceeding against Holocaust deniers with criminal charges under section 319(2.1) CC., it is incumbent on the court to make public these proceedings.

As part of this claim, it is incumbent on the prosecution to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that a Holocaust actually occurred:

Holocaust means the planned and deliberate state-
sponsored persecution and annihilation of European
Jewry by the Nazis and their collaborators from 1933 to
1945;

• Section 319, Criminal Code

In the criminal court of law, the burden of proof lies with the prosecuting authority. If they cannot refute the evidence tendered in R. v Zundel, then the accused person must be acquitted of wrongdoing.

Criminally proceeding against Holocaust deniers finds no legal precedent within the Commonwealth and this proceeding is the first of its kind in North America. Apparently, our interpretation of history can now be imprisonable …

“When the public have suffered, and when they, themselves, demand protection by such laws, then such laws shall be made. To make such laws beforehand, is to sin against the Most High.”

• OAHSPE, Book of Judgement Ch. 35 verse 9

These proceedings come on the heels of Bill C-9, which seeks to remove religious defences under section 319 against hate propaganda charges.

What these developments demonstrate is that there exists an utterly self-serving faction who are lobbying our Parliament to suppress free speech and silence dissenting opinion. This is abhorrent in a society that claims to be “free and democratic”.

It is legislation such as this that is being used to suppress our national identity.

Every Canadian should be paying attention to these proceedings because once a people are prohibited from determining their own history, they stand no chance at counteracting the encroachment of tyranny.