Author: Canadian Nationalist Party

It is through our policies and vision of a better way of life that we will form a majority government by uniting the hearts and minds of Canadians.

Notice Of Self-Representation: R v Patron

Post author By Canadian Nationalist Party
Post date May 9, 2020

Morgan, Courtenay Charles Evan, 1st Viscount Tredegar (1867 - 1934)

TO:
Subjects of English Constitutional Law

FROM:
Travis Patron
Canadian Nationalist Party Inc.

DATE SERVED: May 9^th, 2020

Notice Of Self-Representation: R v Patron

Subjects of English Constitutional Law,

This is a notice of self-representation in regards to the following alleged offenses which currently lay before Mr. Travis Patron, leader and member of our political constituency:

• [Section 266(b) CC];
• [Section 268(1) CC];
• [Section 733.1(1);
• [Section 145(3).

On November 27^th, 2019, the Canadian Nationalist Party petitioned the Crown requesting the establishment of an extrajudicial tribunal capable of settling criminal and civil liabilities on behalf of our constituency. As there has thus far been a failure to respond to this petition which was made to The Crown, we take it to mean that there exists no outstanding objection to this intention.

The prosecuting authority which originally brought forth the charges has failed to provide full disclosure to the accused. The accused has thus far appeared in court on 7 separate occasions without being served full disclosure. Disclosure, which has been in the possession of the prosecuting authority at the time charges were originally lain, has been withheld from the accused for half a year. Failure to provide the accused of disclosure, without delay, may violate their constitutional right to a fair trial. Evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the accused constitutional rights must be excluded from use in a court of law. Therefore, we ask The Crown to serve the accused full disclosure of evidence immediately and without additional delay.

In accordance with the treaty of Magna Carta, which was sealed by King John of England in the year 1215 at Runnymede, and successfully invoked on March 23^rd, 2001, we ask all levels of government in Canada (federal, provincial, & municipal) to honour our notice of self-representation and our request to settle these alleged offenses under the authority of our court and our political jurisdiction. All subjects of The Crown must, by Royal Command abide by constitutional law embodied in the Magna Carta, which supersedes Statutes and Acts sanctified by Parliament.

The Crown must uphold the following constitutional provisions which embody the Supreme Law of the realm:

Clause 39 – No free man is to be arrested, or imprisoned, or disseised, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any other way ruined, nor will [The Crown] go against him or send against him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.
Clause 20 – A free man is not to be amerced for a small offence except in proportion to the nature of the offence, and for a great offence he is to be amerced in accordance with its magnitude, saving to him his livelihood, and a merchant in the same manner, saving to him his stock in trade, and a villein is to be amerced in the same manner, saving to him his growing crops, if they fall into [The Crown’s] mercy. And none of the aforesaid amercements is to be imposed except by the oath of trustworthy men of the vicinity.
Clause 52 – If anyone has been disseised or dispossessed by [The Crown], without lawful judgment of his peers, of lands, castles, liberties, or of his right, we will restore them to him immediately. And if dispute should arise concerning this, then it is to be dealt with by judgment of the twenty-five barons named in the security for peace.
Clause 40 – [The Crown] will not sell, nor deny, nor delay right or justice to anyone
Clause 17 – Common pleas are not to follow [The Crown’s] court but are to be held in some fixed place.
Clause 34 – A writ of Praecipe is not in the future to be issued to anyone for any tenement in respect of which a free man could lose his court.
Clause 38 – No bailiff is in future to put anyone to law by his accusation alone, without trustworthy witnesses being brought in for this.
Clause 54 – No man is to be arrested or imprisoned on account of a woman’s appeal for the death of anyone other than her own husband.
Clause 60 – All these customs and liberties that [The Crown] has granted shall be observed in the kingdom in so far as concerns [their] own relations with [their] subjects. Let all men of [their] kingdom, whether clergy or laymen, observe them similarly in their relations with their own men.
Clause 62 – [The Crown] will not seek to procure from anyone, either by [their] own efforts or those of a third party, anything by which any part of these concessions or liberties might be revoked or diminished. Should such a thing be procured, it shall be null and void and [The Crown] will at no time make use of it, either [themselves] or through a third party.

The above affirmations and claims are valid as to our lawful understanding, and which are sworn by on penalty of perjury and commercial liability (March 3^rd, 2020).

With God as our witness, and in recognizing the principal of justice enshrined as stare decisis, we agree to proceed in good faith – lawfully, honourably, and truthfully – else the administration may be called into disrepute.

In putting Subjects of English Constitutional Law on public notice of our standing, with the intent to prevent any breach of peace, we request, as obliged, prompt acknowledgement or objection of this notice including any undue consideration.

Signed,

News Release

CNP Issuing Tax Receipts

Post author By Canadian Nationalist Party
Post date April 28, 2020

The Canadian Nationalist Party is continuing to issue tax receipts for those who have generously donated to the party. These receipts can be used to claim a tax credit due to the fact the CNP is a federally-registered party.

To make a donation: Party Donation

TAX CREDITS

All Canadians are eligible to receive generous tax credits when they donate to the Canadian Nationalist Party. The size of donation determines the tax credit available.

If you have already made a contribution this year, please use the table below to calculate your cumulative tax credit.

Donations between 0 and $400: give you a 75% refund.
Donations between $400 and $750: give you $300 plus 50% of any amount over $400.
Donations over $750: give you $475 plus 33% of any amount over $750 up to a maximum of $650 per year.

LIMITS ON CONTRIBUTIONS

Only Canadian citizens or permanent residents may make political contributions, in each of the following amounts:

No more than $1,625 in any calendar year to each registered political party.
No more than $1,625 in total in any calendar year to the combined entities of each registered political party (Electoral District Associations, Nomination Contestants and Candidate campaigns).
No more than $1,625 in total between all registered leadership contestants in a particular leadership contest.

LEARN MORE

For more information about tax credits please visit the Canada Revenue Agency website and for more information about contribution limits, please visit Elections Canada.

Notice

Notice Of Claim Of Right: Common Law Tribunal

Post author By Canadian Nationalist Party
Post date April 28, 2020

On February 7^th, 2001 the original 'Committee Of Twenty-Five Barons' did petition the British Crown on withholding Royal Assent from any Parliamentary Bill which attempted to ratify the Treaty Of Nice. In this petition, the Committee referenced not only the Magna Carta, but the Declaration of Rights and Coronation Oath (1953). Response to the petition *did occur* on the 39^th day of the 40 days which were provided for by law. The 'Committee Of Twenty-Five Barons' then invoked Article 61 of the Magna Carta on March 23^rd, 2001, and continue to act with Lawful Dissent until redress has been made and for as long as they abide by English Constitution without deviation.

*Disclaimer: The following is a declaration served on April 28^th, 2020 to the municipality of Redvers, district of Souris – Moose Mountain, Province Of Saskatchewan, and Dominion Of Canada.

Fellow Canadians,

We are gathered here today declaring the lawful formation of a Common Law Tribunal in accordance with our constitutional rights embodied in the Magna Carta of 1215, which was successfully invoked on March 23^rd, 2001, and sworn on by our political constituency on March 3^rd, 2020. With God as our witness, and as a declaration calling on the assistance of the community in asserting Natural Justice and Due Process, we swear to do everything in our power to proceed with this Common Law Tribunal lawfully, honourably, and truthfully.

When one of you has a grievance against another, does he dare go to law before the unrighteous instead of the saints? Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world is to be judged by you, are you incompetent to try trivial cases? Do you not know that we are to judge angels? How much more, then, matters pertaining to this life! So if you have such cases, why do you lay them before those who have no standing in the church? I say this to your shame. Can it be that there is no one among you wise enough to settle a dispute between the brothers, but brother goes to law against brother, and that before unbelievers? To have lawsuits at all with one another is already a defeat for you. Why not rather suffer wrong? Why not rather be defrauded? But you yourselves wrong and defraud—even your own brothers! Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God. – 1 Corinthians 6, Lawsuits Among Believers

As an additional lawful precedent for establishing a Common Law Tribunal under the dominion of our federal political constituency, we reference Aboriginal Sentencing Circles, which are used throughout Canada for the purposes of restorative justice, and rehabilitating the offender to avoid recidivism and reoffense:

Sentencing circles have been used in much of the country, mostly at the provincial/territorial court level, in minor criminal cases involving Aboriginal offenders and their victims. Various Supreme Court of Canada decisions have interpreted changes to the Criminal Code that instructed courts to consider alternative sentences for all offenders, and to pay particular attention to the circumstances of Aboriginal offenders. The Supreme Court found that sentencing judges must examine the unique factors which may have played a part in bringing a particular Aboriginal offender before the courts, and the types of available sanctions and sentencing procedures (including sentencing circles) which may be appropriate in light of the offender’s Aboriginal heritage or identity. – Alternative Approaches, Canada’s Court System

On November 27^th, 2019, we the Canadian Nationalist Party, petitioned the Crown, requesting the establishment of an extrajudicial tribunal capable of settling criminal and civil liabilities on behalf of our constituency. These proceedings, as originally proposed, would be conducted transparently in order to ensure the highest standards of equity, fairness, and respect for the rule of law. As we originally proposed, the intention of this extrajudicial organization would be to ease the burden of an already delayed court system, protect the rights of Canadians to a fair trial, and to uphold the rule of law – in recognition that no one is above the law and that every person must be held accountable for their actions lest the administration of justice be brought into disrepute.

As there has thus far been a failure to respond to this petition which was made to the Crown, we take it to mean that there exists no outstanding objection to this intention. In accordance with our constitutional rights as embodied in the Magna Carta, which remains as binding upon the Crown today as the day it was sealed at Runnymede on the fifteenth day of June in the seventeenth year of the reign of King John of England, we do hereby declare the lawful formation of a Common Law Tribunal under this treaty in conduct of justice enshrined as stare decisis.

These Common Law judicial provisions include, but are not limited to, the following:

We reserve the right of habeas corpus, to be free from arbitrary detention or imprisonment before any evidence has been produced within a court, wherein the evidence provides good reason for remand, as well as the right to consult counsel without delay and to be informed of this right.
We reserve the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty before a judge or jury of our peers. Crown counsel must present evidence to an unbiased judge or jury in an open court to prove guilt. If reasonable doubt remains, the accused must be acquitted.
We reserve the right to procedural defense against double jeopardy, that an accused cannot be tried again on the same (or similar) charges following a valid acquittal or conviction.
We reserve the right to negotiate extradition procedure based on bilateral treaties. We recognize political offense exemption involving overt acts or omissions (where there is a duty to act), which prejudice the interests of the state, its government, or the political system. Such provisions allow the state whose assistance has been requested to refuse to hand over a suspect to — or to gather evidence on behalf of — another state, if the requested party’s competent authority determines that the requesting party seeks assistance in order to prosecute an offense of a political character.
We reserve the right of exclusionary rule, which prevents evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the accused constitutional rights from being used in a court of law.
We reserve the right to a fair trial within a reasonable time.
We reserve the right to avoid self-incrimination, including provision that adverse inferences cannot be made by judge or jury regarding the refusal of a defendant to answer questions before or during a trial, hearing or any other legal proceeding.
We reserve the right to remain silent.

We pledge to save from harm The Throne, The Queen, and Her Heirs. We will not sell, nor deny, nor delay right or justice to anyone. The Crown cannot proceed against any freeman, or send others to do so, except according to the lawful sentence of their peers and according to the Common Law. A freeman is not to be amerced for a small offence except in proportion to the nature of the offence, and for a great offence he is to be amerced in accordance with its magnitude, saving to him his livelihood, and a merchant in the same manner, saving to him his stock in trade, and a villein is to be amerced in the same manner, saving to him his growing crops, if they fall into our mercy. And none of the aforesaid amercements is to be imposed except by the oath of trustworthy men of the locality. If anyone has been disseized or dispossessed by the Crown, without lawful judgment of their peers, of lands, castles, liberties, or of their right, it is to be restored to them immediately. And if dispute should arise concerning this, then it is to be dealt with by judgment of the original ‘Committee Of Twenty-Five Barons’ in the security for peace.

All citizens of the realm have a lawful duty to recognize this treaty until the Crown has made redress. Those who fail to honour the treaty of Magna Carta may be held criminally liable for aiding and abetting High Treason.

The above affirmations and claims are valid as to our lawful understanding, and which are sworn by on penalty of perjury and commercial liability.

In putting subjects of the British Crown on public notice of our standing in law, with the intent to prevent any breach of peace, we request, as lawfully obliged, prompt acknowledgement or objection of this notice including any undue consideration.

The wheel of justice must continue to turn – and it will do so under our Common Law Tribunal.

Signed,