Year: 2020

Categories
News Release

CNP Files Civil Lawsuit Against City Of Saskatoon

The Canadian Nationalist Party has filed a civil lawsuit against the City Of Saskatoon, claiming an infringement of constitutional rights to peacefully assemble and freely express themselves during the recent 43rd Federal Election: Canadian Nationalist Party – Statement Of Claim

https://twitter.com/TravisPatron/status/1225176910621052929?s=20

STATEMENT OF PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM

  1. The PLAINTIFF, Canadian Nationalist Party Inc., is the Chief Agent of the federally-registered political party Canadian Nationalist Party (Nationalist).
  2. The DEFENDANT, City Of Saskatoon, is a municipality incorporated in Saskatchewan.
  3. During the recent 43rd Federal Election, and after the drop of the writ, the PLAINTIFF requested from the DEFENDANT the use of public property at City Hall to assemble and communicate their policies for the sake of informing voters and nominating candidates. This request was not permitted to proceed for reasons stated ‘denominational’.
  4. The DEFENDANT continues to permit the use of the space to adjacent, competing political parties but has denied requests from PLAINTIFF on three separate occasions.
  5. The PLAINTIFF states that the cost of this denial has directly affected their electoral viability, as well as financial costs associated with obtaining federal eligibility, marketing costs associated with promoting the visibility of the organization, and travel/accommodation expenses of the Canadian Nationalist Party members and existing candidates.
  6. By disallowing the Canadian Nationalist Party a permit to assemble publicly, the City of Saskatoon is openly violating the democratic rights protected by the Charter Of Rights And Freedoms (Section 2) of a political party sanctioned by the Canadian Government.

THE PLAINTIFF, THEREFORE, CLAIMS:

  1. judgment by way of public acknowledgement that the ability of the plaintiff to democratically compete in the recent 43rd Federal Election has been infringed.
  2. judgement in the sum of $34,850;
  3. interest pursuant to Canada Elections Act & The Pre-Judgment Interest Act; and
  4. such further costs as this Honourable Court may deem just.

Constitutional law – Charter of Rights – Fundamental Freedoms (Section 2) – Right to freedom of peaceful assembly

Constitutional law – Charter of Rights – Fundamental Freedoms (Section 2) – Right to freedom of expression

6:03 MEANING OF “FREE AND DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY”

R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103, D:0017, at p. 136, Dickson C.J., for the Court, stated that the phrase “free and democratic society”

… refers the Court to the very purpose for which the Charter was originally entrenched in the Constitution: Canadian society is to be free and democratic. The Court must be guided by the values and principles essential to a free and democratic society which I believe embody, to name but a few, respect for the inherent dignity of the human person, commitment to social justice and equality, accommodation of a wide variety of beliefs, respect for cultural and group identity, and faith in social and political institutions which enhance the participation of individuals and groups in society.

Since Section 1 constitutionally guarantees the rights and freedoms which follow in the Charter, “any s. 1 inquiry must be premised on an understanding that the impugned limit violates constitutional rights and freedoms – rights and freedoms which are part of the supreme law of Canada”: R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103, D:0017, at p. 135.

The phrase “free and democratic society” is significant – “the underlying values and principles of a free and democratic society are the genesis of the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Charter and the ultimate standard against which a limit on a right or freedom must be shown, despite its effect, to be reasonable and demonstrably justified”: R. v. Oakes, at p. 136.

The Supreme Court of Canada set out its basic test for determining whether a legislative provision is justified in R. v. Oakes. According to the Court, s. 1 imposes a “stringent standard of justification”. A stringent standard of justification must be adopted because of the meaning of “free and democratic society” (see para. 6:03) and because the justification analysis is being undertaken after the Court has found that constitutionally guaranteed rights have been violated. The test adopted by the majority of the Court in Oakes is as follows:

(1) the objective, which the legislation in issue is designed to advance, must be “of sufficient importance to warrant overriding a constitutionally protected right or freedom”; and

(2) a three-fold proportionality test must be satisfied:

(a) the legislation must be rationally connected to the achievement of the objective in question – it must not be arbitrary, unfair or based on irrational considerations;

(b) the legislation should impair as little as possible the right or freedom in question; and

(c) there must be a proportionality between the effects of the legislation which is responsible for limiting the Charter right or freedom and the objective which has been identified as having sufficient importance. (Oakes, at pp. 138-40)

The issue of justification is to be assessed “objectively” and not from the standpoint of the legislators.

In McKinney v. University of Guelph, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 229, D:0147, La Forest J. Stated: (at pp. 280-1):

“The matter must, as earlier cases have held, involve a test of proportionality. In cases of this kind, the test must be approached in a flexible manner. The analysis should be functional, focusing on the character of the classification in question, the constitutional and societal importance of the interests adversely affected, the relative importance to the individuals affected of the benefit of which they are deprived, and the importance of the state interest.”

The majority of the Court in Committee for the Commonwealth of Canada v. Canada, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 139, D:0160, held that the blanket exclusion of person from distributing leaflets in non-security areas of a federal airport was overbroad. L’Heureux-Dube J. Helf that the impugned provision was so broad, especially given the terms “undertaking”, “otherwise”, “solicit” and “advertise”, that it could include just about any activity. She noted that the impugned provision prohibited all expressive activity in the airport simply because some activities may be disruptive. McLachlin J. Agreed that the regulation was overbroad. The prevention of “political propaganda activities” constituted a blanket exclusion of political solicitation in the airport unrelated to concerns for the function of the airport and devoid of safeguards to protect against over-reaching application. These same two Justices also appeared to support a deferential approach to the application of s. 1. See para. 6:05[6].

The onus of proving that a limit on a right or freedom is reasonable and demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society rests upon the party seeking to uphold the limitation: Hunter v. Southam Inc., [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145, D:0003, at p. 169; R. v. Oakes, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 103, D:0017, at pp. 136-7. In Oakes, Dickson C.J. referred to a “presumption” that the rights and freedoms are guaranteed unless the party invoking s. 1 can bring itself within the “exceptional” criteria which justify their being limited.

In Canadian Human Rights Commission v. Taylor, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 892, D:0154, McLachlin J., held that the deleterious effects of the impugned provision outweighed the importance of the objective. She stated (at pp. 968-9):

“The significance of the infringement of the right at issue in this case is most serious. The limitation touches expression which may be relevant to social and political issues. Free expression on such matters has long been regarded as fundamental to the working of a free democracy and to the maintenance and preservation of our most fundamental freedoms. The right to express oneself freely on such matters is not lightly to be trammeled; a limitation on such expression must be proportionate to the evil and sensitive to the need to preserve as much freedom of expression as may be compatible with suppressing that evil.”

Party Leader Travis Patron recently issued a statement on the state of the 43rd Federal Election and the Canadian Nationalist Party’s inability to access publicly-funded infrastructure entitled The Emperor Wears No Clothes.

Categories
Featured

The Emperor Wears No Clothes

trudeau-communist-cropped

The recent 43rd Federal Election has fundamentally demonstrated that our right to self-determination, as Canadian Nationalists, is being suppressed by the current administration. Under these circumstances, our ability to assemble publicly and speak our policies to Canadian voters has, and continues to be, denied to us.

The right to self-determination represents the ability for a people to form their own state and choose their own government. Under the current conditions bestowed upon us, this is essentially impossible, as our ability to assemble publicly and communicate our policies as a federal party has been prohibited to us before and during general elections. Therefore, we will not acknowledge the authority of the Federal/Provincial/Municipal Governments involved given that they have violated these constitutional rights as well as suppressed our self-determination as a unique nationality.

Since we began our campaign in 2017, our candidates have been physically attacked, have faced a concerted attempt to sabotage our efforts to attain federal registration as a political party, a systemic effort to censor our ability to communicate policies to the voting public, and a coordinated effort to tarnish our reputation from a number of media outlets.

We have been falsely accused of violating hate speech legislation. The same people who file trademark infringement complaint with the Federal Police Force then use their media outlets to claim law enforcement is “going after” us, when in actually, no crime has been committed whatsoever.

Public institutions such as City Halls, University Campuses, Public Libraries, and Convention Centers which operate from our tax dollars have been prohibited to us (since 2017) for reasons never justified.

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

Fundamental Freedoms:
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
(c) freedom of peaceful assembly

The institutions in Canada which have prohibited us from accessing them without reason include, but are not limited to:

Every one of these institutions receives operating grants from various levels of government. These operating grants are enabled by the tax codes we as citizens abide by. Canadian citizens abide by tax laws because we trust that these institutions, which we fund, will be made available to us when we wish to assemble and express ourselves. We have supporters and members within our party who have been criminally charged and spent 1+ years in prison due to not complying with these tax codes – yet the beneficiaries of this type of taxation cannot even provide us a channel to determine our own fate.

This desire to utilize public resources and exercise our constitutional rights has been violated consistently and without reason, including after the drop of the writ during the 43rd Federal Election as we were actively nominating candidates. The exclusion of our political party from public spaces and prohibition from booking publicly-funded venues has directly affected our ability to both nominate candidates and inform the public of our policies. Even today, we consistently come across Canadians who have never heard of our party. We believe this ignorance of us as a viable political option would be less pronounced if we were able to access the same democratic channels as other political parties.

The City Of Saskatoon has consistently denied us a permit to assemble despite the fact they have granted one to competing political parties in between our requests for access. The stated reason of denial has been that our organization is ‘denominational’ in nature. We were denied a permit after the writ had dropped for the 43rd Federal Election. This came at a time when we were working to nominate candidates and promote our policies. However, our prohibition from public spaces make a democratic victory unrealistic.

On July 3rd, 2017, we announced our intention to host an event at the University Of Toronto to discuss the nationalist movement in Canada. Roughly a month later, we were outright denied space. The University Of Toronto claims the ideology of Canadian nationalism poses a “significant safety risk to their students” despite gleefully hosting Bolshevik Communists on a regular basis.

After the Ontario Provincial Government mandated free speech at universities in 2019, only 1 event was not allowed to go ahead: ours. The Canadian Nationalist Party made a follow up request to the University Of Toronto in 2019, which was again denied. It seems the idea that Canada is a unique nation is an idea too dangerous for the public to handle.

The Toronto Public Library refuses to grant us space on the grounds that advocating “maintaining our European-descended demographic majority” is discriminatory and therefore unacceptable. It seems as though if you are someone who believes Canada should maintain the people who founded the country, you are simply not allowed to use the library …

Both the Toronto Metro Convention Center & TCU Place cannot honour our booking request due to concerns that our opposition might vandalize their property. These are issues outside our control, but our tax revenues do indeed go towards funding law enforcement that is tasked with keeping the peace at such events. When even basic services such as law enforcement keeping the peace are not respected, the financial return on our tax dollars is non-existent.

A number of the venues which we request space from justify denying us access by referencing “media reports” which negatively portray our party. One such example is a recent event we held in Winnipeg at the Belgian Club where local media presented a blatantly one-sided narrative of the event and the masked hooligans who attempted to disrupt it. After these hooligans were escorted out of the venue by Winnipeg police, our event proceeded as planned, giving a presentation on the need for immigration reform. These “media reports” cannot be used as grounds to disenfranchise federal parties from campaigning, as they lack any accurate or balanced reporting of our activities. What is not reported out of all these cancellations and denials-of-service is the time, money, and energy that people contribute to this project. For example, on several occasions we have had these bookings cancelled mere hours before they were scheduled to begin. This means that people travelling from out-of-province are left with nothing but wasted resources for their efforts. This also does damage to the reputation of our party, as the people who make the effort to attend the first time but were cancelled on, will more than likely not make the effort the second time around.

To date, our constituency has violated no hate speech legislation and initiated no violence at public gatherings. At one such public gathering in 2019, our candidate for Scarborough-Guildwood was blind-side attacked by a masked hooligan. This attack sparked an altercation in the Eaton Center which the media has then used to suggest our membership is prone to violent acts. Let me be clear: self-defense is not a crime. We will defend ourselves and our viewpoints wherever and whenever necessary. For this act, we require no permission.

From the very outset of our announcement in November, 2017 to “be on the ballot” for the 43rd Federal Election we have experienced systemic discrimination on the basis of nothing more than our political stance of Canadian nationalism. This denial of the Canadian Nationalist Party, a federally-sanctioned political party, to receive publicly-funded services demonstrates that our government is engaging in taxation without representation. We have proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Canada does not have a legitimate democratic channel for citizens to exercise their self-determination.

The message to us is clear: the current government in Canada is opposed to the nationhood of our country and does not support the constitutional rights of a federal political party to assemble on public property and communicate their policies to Canadian voters. This is a political ideology that resonates with millions of citizens, yet our government continues to deny our requests for public permits. It seems in Canada, we have (quite literally) no rights to speak of.

These types of transgressions are intolerable to us and paint the picture of a democratic channel that is made available only to political narratives which support the “post-national” dictatorship our current Prime Minister has vocally endorsed.

If the injustices and complete lack of self-determination afforded to us by the current government administration is not corrected, our very livelihood will suffer.

We encourage supporters of our party to join us in non-compliance. We have no interest nor obligation to obey an authority so brutish it prosecutes and collects tax revenues from the populace while simultaneously violating their constitutional rights. Not permitting a federal party to assemble publicly and communicate its policies to voters only demonstrates that our democracy in its current state is an illusion.

We will continue informing foreign governments of the fraudulent and unconstitutional elections Canada is hosting.

If the Canadian Government prohibits a federal political party from exercising their ability to assemble and speak then it only follows that that federal party prohibit the Canadian Government from speaking on its behalf.


Travis Patron
Leader of the Canadian Nationalist Party

The principle of self-determination is prominently embodied in Article I of the Charter of the United Nations. Earlier it was explicitly embraced by US President Woodrow Wilson, by Lenin and others, and became the guiding principle for the reconstruction of Europe following World War I. The principle was incorporated into the 1941 Atlantic Charter and the Dumbarton Oaks proposals which evolved into the United Nations Charter. Its inclusion in the UN Charter marks the universal recognition of the principle as fundamental to the maintenance of friendly relations and peace among states. It is recognized as a right of all peoples in the first article common to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights which both entered into force in 1976. 1 Paragraph 1 of this Article provides:

All peoples have the right to self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.

The right to self-determination of peoples is recognized in many other international and regional instruments, including the Declaration of Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation Among States adopted b the UN General Assembly in 1970, 2, the Helsinki Final Act adopted by the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe (CSCE) in 1975, 3, the African Charter of Human and Peoples’ Rights of 1981, 4, the CSCE Charter of Paris for a New Europe adopted in 1990, 5, and the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action of 1993. 6, It has been affirmed by the International Court of Justice in the Namibia case 7, the Western Sahara case 8, and the East Timor case 9, in which its erga omnes character was confirmed. Furthermore, the scope and content of the right to self-determination has been elaborated upon by the UN Human Rights Committee 10, and the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination 11, and numerous leading international jurists.

That the right to self-determination is part of so called hard law has been affirmed also by the International Meeting of Experts for the Elucidation of the Concepts of Rights of Peoples brought together by UNESCO from 1985 to 1991, 12, it came to the conclusion that (1) peoples’ rights are recognized in international law; (2) the list of such rights is not very clear, but also that (3) hard law does in any event include the right to self-determination and the right to existence, in the sense of the Genocide Convention.

The inclusion of the right to self-determination in the International Covenants on Human Rights and in the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, referred to above, emphasizes that self-determination is an integral part of human rights law which has a universal application. At the same time, it is recognized that compliance with the right of self-determination is a fundamental condition for the enjoyment of other human rights and fundamental freedoms, be they civil, political, economic, social or cultural.

– UNPO: Self-Determination In International Law

We encourage supporters of this message to print and distribute this flyer in their communities, campuses, and high visibility locations: [PDF] statement-of-non-compliance

Categories
Activism

Red Dawn: Establishment Of The Occult World

Note: This information has been reproduced from educational purposes only and is not legitimized or authenticated by our organization.

The following is a leaked document translated from French of a group of senior financiers who met in Canada in 1967 and again in 1985. The document details plans to establish a global government by corrupting the finances, immigration laws, and traditions of nation states. The United Nations plays a central role in forming this global government after the perpetrators of this plan are successful in their suppression of the various nation states.

DOCUMENT: “THE RED DAWN”

Title of the document of 6.6.6.: THE RED DAWN.
The Purpose of the Globalist Project: ESTABLISHMENT OF THE OCCULT WORLD
The Means of Financing the Project: Control of the IMF, GATT, the Commission of Brussels, of NATO, of the UN and other International Organizations.

The last eighteen years were very profitable for the advancement of our global projects. I can tell you, Brothers, we are now touching it, almost there. The fall of Nation-States is only a matter of time, and that rather short, I can tell you with confidence.

With our undercover agents and our colossal financial resources, unprecedented progress has now been made in all areas of Science and Technology, which we control [through] the largest financial corporations. From the secret meetings with Mr. de Rotchild in year 56, and who had intended to finalize the development and global implementation of the “Computer”, it is now possible to envisage the establishment of a kind of “International Highway” where all these machines are interconnected. For as you know, direct control of individual people on the planet would be at least totally impossible without the use of computers and their link electronically with respect to each other in a huge “Network World”.

These machines also have the advantage in being able to replace millions of people. Moreover, they have neither conscience nor any moral, which is essential for the success of a project like ours. Above all, these machines do, without question, everything that is dictated to them. They are the perfect slaves that have been dreamed by our predecessors, they who were able to suspect that one day it would be possible to accomplish such a prodigy. These machines without a country, no colour, no religion, no political affiliation and achievement, are the ultimate tool for our New World Order. They are the “Cornerstone”!

The organization of these machines into a vast “Network World”, which we will control the levers of, we use to immobilize people. How?

As you know, the basic structure of our New World Order is composed, in essence, of a multitude of “Networks”, each covering all different spheres of human activity over the whole of the planet. Until now, all these “Networks” were linked together by a common ideological basis: that of man as the “Centre” and “Ultimate Achievement” of the Universe.

So thanks to all these “Networks”, united by the bond of the “New Religion of Man to Man”, we have easily infiltrated all human sectors in all Western countries, and changed their “Judeo-Christian” basis. The result is that today, this Man, he is part of the Politics, the Economy, the Social, Education, and the Science of Religion, and has already, since our last meeting at the end of June 67, abandoned his past heritage and replaced it with our ideal of a World Religion based solely on Man. Having cut as well as possible its historical roots, this Man is waiting, finally, to be offered a new ideology. This, properly understood, is ours, that of the “Global Village Community”, which will be the “Centre”. And that is precisely what we will give him, encouraging him to take part, “Body and Soul”, in this “Global Electronic Network” where the borders of nation-states have been forever abolished, wiped out up to their deepest roots.

While this lost man will be absorbed by its blind enthusiasm to be part of its new “Global Community”, by being part of this vast “Network of Computers”, for our part, we shall see, from the levers above, which will be hidden in the file, and be able to identify, to recognize, the rewards of our own goals.

Because within this “New Global Society”, any individual with a potential “Profitability” for us, cannot escape. The constant influx of “Electronic Technology” will make sure all the means to file, identify, and monitor all individuals in populations of the West. For those who do not represent “Exploitable Profitability” by ourselves, we will ensure they are eliminated through all the local civil wars that we have taken care to break out here and there through: the work of our servants; and the “Fall of the Economy” of the Nation-States; and the “Oppositions and Claims” of various groups within those states.

Here is the detail with which we will by 1998 be able to pave the way for the birth of our “World Government”:

1. – Expand the “Leisure Society” which has been so profitable to date. By using the invention of the “Video” that we’ve funded, and games attached to it, end up perverting the morals of youth. Offer him the opportunity now to satisfy all his instincts. A being possessed by his senses, and slave of these, we know, will have neither ideal nor the inner strength to defend anything. It is an “individualist” in nature, and is a perfect candidate which we can easily shape to our desires and our priorities. Besides, remember how easily our predecessors were able to turn all German youth at the beginning of the century using the disillusionment of the latter!

2. – Encourage “Student Causes” for all cases related to the “Ecology”. The mandatory protection of the latter will be a major asset on the day we will have pushed the Nation-States to exchange their “Domestic Debt” for a loss of 33% of all their territories remaining in the wild.

3. – Let us fill the inner void of that youth by initiating, from a very young age, the world of computers. Use this as its education system. A slave in the service of another slave we control.

4. – On another level, establish “International Free Trade” as a priority for the economic survival of the Nation-States. This new conception will help us accelerate the economic decline of the “Nationalists” of all nations, to isolate the various factions, and in due course, to fiercely oppose each other in wars that will complete the ruin of these nations.

5. – To ensure at all costs the success of such an endeavour, let us ensure that our agents, who have infiltrated the Ministries of Intergovernmental Affairs and Immigration of the Nation-States, make major changes to the Statutes of these ministries. These changes will essentially open the doors of immigration to Western countries with a large mass of immigrants entering across their frontiers (immigration that we have indeed caused by having taken care to break out here and there, new localised conflicts). Through well-orchestrated press campaigns targeting public opinion in the Nation-States, we provoke them to accept a large influx of refugees which will have the effect of destabilizing the domestic economy, and increasing racial tensions, in their territory. We will ensure that groups of foreign extremists are part of the influx of immigrants, which will facilitate the political, economic, and social, destabilization of the Nations concerned.

6. – With “Free Trade”, which in reality is not free because it is already controlled by us at the top of the economic hierarchy, infiltrated by the”Trilateral Commission” [that], we will bring discord within the Nation-States by rising unemployment related to restructuring of our Multinationals.

7. – Slowly but surely we will move our multinationals into new countries with the idea of a “Market Economy”, such as the countries of Eastern Europe, Russia and China, for example. We do not much care, for the moment, if their population has or has not a large pool of new consumers. What interests us, primarily, is to have access to the “Slave Labour” (cheap and non-union) that we offer these countries and the Third World. Moreover, are their governments not put in place by us? Do they not call for foreign aid and loans from our “International Monetary Fund” and our “World Bank”? Such transfers offer many advantages for us. They help to maintain these new populations in the illusion of an “Economic Liberation”, and a “Political Liberty” when in reality we shall prevail over their desire for gain with a debt they can never hope to pay. As for Western populations, they will be maintained in the dream of [Economic] because products imported from these countries will not suffer any price increase. But on the contrary, without them noticing at first, more and more industries will be forced to close their doors because of the transfers [of] we have made out of Western countries. These closures will increase unemployment and bring significant losses of revenue for the Nation-States.

8. – So we will develop a worldwide “Global Economy” which will completely escape the control of Nation-States. Above all in this new economy, no political or union pressure may have power over her. It will dictate its own “Global Issues” and will require a reorganization of politics, but according to our priorities worldwide.

9. – With this “Economic Independence”, having as laws only our laws, we will establish a “Culture of Mass Globalism”. By controlling international Television, and Media, we will institute a “New Culture”, but levelled, uniform for all, without any future “Creation” escaping us. Artists will reflect our future image or will not survive. No more this time will “Independent Cultural Creations” at any time put in jeopardy our globalist projects, as was so often the case in the past.

10. – By the same economy [“Par], we will then be able to make use of the military forces of nation states (such as those in the U.S.) in humanitarian aims. In reality, these “forces” we will use to submit recalcitrant countries to our will. Thus the Third World, and others like them, will not be able to escape our willingness to use their people as slave labour.

11. – To control the world market, we will divert the productivity of its first goal (to free man from the hardness of work). We shall orientate it to turn it against man by enslaving this last to our economic system where he will have no choice but to become our slave, or become a criminal.

12. – All these transfers abroad of our multinationals, and reorganizing the global economy, will aim, inter alia, to drive up unemployment in Western countries. This situation will be more feasible because at the beginning we favoured the massive importation of commodities within the Nation-States, and at the same time, we have overloaded those States by overuse of their population in the production of services they cannot pay. These extreme conditions will be multiplied by the millions on welfare bodies of all kinds, illiterate, homeless. etc.

13. – With the loss of millions of jobs in the primary sector; caused by the same disguised escape of foreign capital out of the Nation-States, it will be possible to develop the death of social harmony with the spectre of civil war.

14. – The international manipulations of governments and peoples of the Nation-States will give us the excuse to use our IMF to push Western governments to implement “Austerity Budgets”, under the cover of a reduction of their illusory “National Debt” and the retaining of their hypothetical “International Credit Rating” and the preservation of the impossible “Social Peace”.

15. – Using those “Budgetary Emergency Budgetary Measures”, we will break the financing of the Nation-States for all their “Mega-Projects” which represent a direct threat to our global control of the economy.

16. – Besides all these austerity measures will allow us to break the national will in modern structures in the areas of Energy, Agriculture, Transport and New Technologies.

17. – These same measures will give us the perfect opportunity to introduce our “Ideology of Economic Competition”. This will mean, within the Nation-States, through the voluntary reduction of wages, the voluntary departure with [the], which will open the door to the installation of our “Technology Control”. At this time, all departures will be replaced by “Computers” in our service.

18. – These social changes will help us to fundamentally change the workforce and the “Police and Military” of the Nation-States. Without arousing suspicion, under the pretext of the necessity of time, we will get rid once and for all of all individuals with a “Judeo-Christian Conscience.” In this “Restructuring of the Police Corps and the Military” we will dismiss without challenge the older staff, as well as all elements not carrying forward our globalist principles. These will be replaced by young recruits, lacking “Conscience and Morality”, and already all trained, and supporting the reckless use of our “Technology of Networked Electronics”.

19. – At the same time, and always under the pretext of “budget cuts”, we will ensure the transfer of military bases of the Nation-States to the United Nations.

20. – To this end, we will work for the reorganization of the “International Mandate of the UN”. From “Peace Force” with no decision making power, we shall raise them to become an “Intervention Force” which will, in a while, render the military forces of the Nation-States homogenous. This will allow us to, without fighting, achieve the demilitarisation of all these states so that none of them in the future are sufficiently strong (independent) to challenge our “World Power”.

21. – To accelerate the transfer process, we will involve the current strength of the United Nations in intractable conflicts. In this way, and with the help of the media that we control, we’ll show people the impotence and uselessness of this “Force” in its current form. Frustration helping, and pushed to its climax at the right time, it will push the people of Nation-States to beg international bodies to form such a “Multi-National Force” at the earliest opportunity, to protect at all costs the “Peace”.

22 . – The emergence of the next global commitment to a “Multi-National Military Force” will go hand in hand with the establishment, within the United Nations, of an “Multi-Jurisdictional Intervention Force”. Using this combination of “Effective Police and Military”, created by the same pretext of increasing political and social instability within these states collapsing under the burden of economic problems, we can better control the western populations. Here, the excessive use of electronic filing and identification of individuals will provide a complete monitoring of all populations.

23. – The reorganization of police and military, internal and external, of the Nation-States will converge on the obligation of all to the establishment of a “World Centre of Judiciary”. The “Centre” will allow the individual “Police Corps of Nation-States” prompt access to “Databases” on all individuals potentially dangerous to us on the planet. The image of [striving] better judicial efficiency, and more close links created and maintained with the “Military”, will help us highlight the need for an “International Tribunal” coupled with a “Global Justice System”, one for civil affairs and criminals, and another for Nations.

24. – During the growing acceptance by all of these new requirements, it will be imperative for us to earlier complete the global control of firearms within the territories of the Nation-States. To do this, we will accelerate the “ALPHA PLAN” implemented during the 60s by some of our predecessors. This “Plan” originally had two objectives which have remained the same today:

  1. through the intervention of “crazy shooters” creating a climate of insecurity in people to get them to [support] tighter control of firearms.
  2. orient violence so as to put the blame on religious extremists, or people with religious affiliations who tend to the “Traditional” or, of persons claiming to have privileged communications with God.

Today, to accelerate the “Control of Firearms,” we can use the “Collapse of Economic Conditions” of the Nation-States which will take with it a complete destabilization of the Social [fabric], so increasing violence. I needn’t need to remind you or show you, Brothers, the foundations of this “Control” of firearms. Without it, it would become almost impossible for us to make kneel down the populations of those targeted States. Remember how well our predecessors were able to control Germany in 1930 with the new “laws” implemented at the time, laws which are now the foundation of the current laws of Nation-States for the same control.

25. – These “Steps” refer to the “OMEGA PHASE” experienced from experiments conducted in the early 70s. They contain the application, globally, of “Electro-Magnetic Weapons.” The “Changes of Climate” has caused the:

  1. destruction of crops, and failure, under these conditions, of agricultural land;
  2. denaturation, by artificial means, of food products of common consumption;
  3. the poisoning of nature by an excessive, indiscriminate and widespread use of chemicals in agriculture;

and all this, Brothers, this will lead to certain ruin the food industries of the Nation-States. The future of “Population Control” of these states must go [hand] with the absolute control by us of food production globally, and by taking control of the main “Food Routes” [“Routes] in the world. For this, it is necessary to use the Electro-Magnetic, among others, to destabilize the climates of the States most productive agriculturally. As to the poisoning of nature, it will be speeded up all the more as the increase of populations will push it without restriction.

26. – The use of the Electro-Magnetic will cause “Earthquakes” in the most important industrial regions of the Nation-States, to help speed up the “Economic Collapse” of States most threatening to us; as well to amplify the obligation of the establishment of our New World Order [sic,].

27. – Who will we suspect? Who could have suspected the use of these means? Those who dare against us by disseminating information about the existence and content of our “conspiracy”, will become suspect in the eyes of the authorities of their nation and their people. Thanks to the misinformation, lies, hypocrisy, and individualism, that we have created among the people of the Nation-States, this Man will become an enemy for humans. Thus these “Independent Individuals”, who are more dangerous to us precisely because of their “Freedom”, will be considered by their peers as enemies, not liberators. Child slavery, the pillaging of the Third World, unemployment, propaganda for the liberalisation of anti-drug laws, the brutalization of the youth of Nations, the ideology of “Respect for Individual Freedom” diffused in Judeo-Christian Churches and within the Nation-States, obscurantism considered as a basis of pride, inter-ethnic conflicts, and our latest achievement: “Budget cuts”; with all that we can finally see the performance of our ancestral “Dream”: the introduction of our “NEW WORLD ORDER”.

End of Document – June 1985.