Double Jeopardized

Once again, the Province of Saskatchewan is attempting to criminally proceed against us in response to our political speech Beware The Parasitic Tribe. However, the Crown has yet to provide us a public hearing in the matter as the information used to de-register the Canadian Nationalist Party remains undisclosed.

For those who have bothered to listen, I have been raising this objection for several years now.

Proceedings in criminal and penal matters

“Any Canadian charged with a criminal offense has the right, if finally found guilty and punished for the offence, not to be tried or punished for it again”

• Section 11(h) of the Charter

Pursuant section 19(2)(b) of the Privacy Act, we have the right to access this information. In the meantime, we reserve our right to be presumed innocent on occurrence #2019-919038 in the absence of a public hearing:

Any Canadian charged with a criminal offense has the right to be presumed innocent unless proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal;

• Section 11(d), Charter of Rights and Freedoms

We are jeopardized twice over by the Crown’s neglect of our right to a judicial review in the matter:

Definition:

double jeopardy – common-law and constitutional prohibition against a second prosecution after a first trial for the same offense.

same-evidence test – The “same-evidence test” used in determining the issue of double jeopardy is whether facts alleged in second indictment, if given in evidence, would have sustained a conviction under the first indictment or whether the same evidence would support a conviction in each case.

• Black’s Law Dictionary, 5^th Edition

On October 20^th of last year, we made an application in accordance with section 41 of the Privacy Act for a review where the RCMP refused us access to information #991149331. Contrary to the opinion of the Federal Court, this application was made within the 45-day timeframe allotted for such an application.

This information was obtained by a foreign entity and used to interfere with our right to stand for qualification to the House of Commons as provided by section 3 of the Charter.

As it now stands, the Crown is violating our section 11(a) Charter right to be informed of the specifics of occurrence #2019-919038 within a reasonable time. We have made representations to both the Federal and Provincial government to no avail.

Were the information publicly disclosed today (as it ought to be), we would not be required to live in a society where free expression is considered a crime. These conditions are prejudicial toward our right to mobility under section 6 of the Charter and are having a deleterious effect on our ability to maintain employment.

The Crown is unfairly burdening us with residency requirements while failing to satisfy their burden to establish that access to information #991149331 may be refused.

The Crown is neglecting our section 11(a) Charter right to be informed (within a reasonable time) of the specifics used to deprive us of our political standing:

“No free man shall be deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his peers or by the law of the territory.”

• Clause 39, Magna Carta

In response to this violation of our constitutional right, we intend to protest in furtherance of Canadian nationalism.