The Canadian Nationalist Party is continuing to issue tax receipts for those who have generously donated to the party. These receipts can be used to claim a tax credit due to the fact the CNP is a federally-registered party.
All Canadians are eligible to receive generous tax credits when they donate to the Canadian Nationalist Party. The size of donation determines the tax credit available.
If you have already made a contribution this year, please use the table below to calculate your cumulative tax credit.
Donations between 0 and $400: give you a 75% refund.
Donations between $400 and $750: give you $300 plus 50% of any amount over $400.
Donations over $750: give you $475 plus 33% of any amount over $750 up to a maximum of $650 per year.
LIMITS ON CONTRIBUTIONS
Only Canadian citizens or permanent residents may make political contributions, in each of the following amounts:
No more than $1,625 in any calendar year to each registered political party.
No more than $1,625 in total in any calendar year to the combined entities of each registered political party (Electoral District Associations, Nomination Contestants and Candidate campaigns).
No more than $1,625 in total between all registered leadership contestants in a particular leadership contest.
LEARN MORE
For more information about tax credits please visit the Canada Revenue Agency website and for more information about contribution limits, please visit Elections Canada.
On February 7th, 2001 the original 'Committee Of Twenty-Five Barons' did petition the British Crown on withholding Royal Assent from any Parliamentary Bill which attempted to ratify the Treaty Of Nice. In this petition, the Committee referenced not only the Magna Carta, but the Declaration of Rights and Coronation Oath (1953).
Response to the petition did occur on the 39th day of the 40 days which were provided for by law. The 'Committee Of Twenty-Five Barons' then invoked Article 61 of the Magna Carta on March 23rd, 2001, and continue to act with Lawful Dissent until redress has been made and for as long as they abide by English Constitution without deviation.
*Disclaimer: The following is a declaration served on April 28th, 2020 to the municipality of Redvers, district of Souris – Moose Mountain, Province Of Saskatchewan, and Dominion Of Canada.
Fellow Canadians,
We are gathered here today declaring the lawful formation of a Common Law Tribunal in accordance with our constitutional rights embodied in the Magna Carta of 1215, which was successfully invoked on March 23rd, 2001, and sworn on by our political constituency on March 3rd, 2020. With God as our witness, and as a declaration calling on the assistance of the community in asserting Natural Justice and Due Process, we swear to do everything in our power to proceed with this Common Law Tribunal lawfully, honourably, and truthfully.
When one of you has a grievance against another, does he dare go to law before the unrighteous instead of the saints? Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world is to be judged by you, are you incompetent to try trivial cases? Do you not know that we are to judge angels? How much more, then, matters pertaining to this life! So if you have such cases, why do you lay them before those who have no standing in the church? I say this to your shame. Can it be that there is no one among you wise enough to settle a dispute between the brothers, but brother goes to law against brother, and that before unbelievers? To have lawsuits at all with one another is already a defeat for you. Why not rather suffer wrong? Why not rather be defrauded? But you yourselves wrong and defraud—even your own brothers! Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God. – 1 Corinthians 6, Lawsuits Among Believers
As an additional lawful precedent for establishing a Common Law Tribunal under the dominion of our federal political constituency, we reference Aboriginal Sentencing Circles, which are used throughout Canada for the purposes of restorative justice, and rehabilitating the offender to avoid recidivism and reoffense:
Sentencing circles have been used in much of the country, mostly at the provincial/territorial court level, in minor criminal cases involving Aboriginal offenders and their victims. Various Supreme Court of Canada decisions have interpreted changes to the Criminal Code that instructed courts to consider alternative sentences for all offenders, and to pay particular attention to the circumstances of Aboriginal offenders. The Supreme Court found that sentencing judges must examine the unique factors which may have played a part in bringing a particular Aboriginal offender before the courts, and the types of available sanctions and sentencing procedures (including sentencing circles) which may be appropriate in light of the offender’s Aboriginal heritage or identity. – Alternative Approaches, Canada’s Court System
On November 27th, 2019, we the Canadian Nationalist Party, petitioned the Crown, requesting the establishment of an extrajudicial tribunal capable of settling criminal and civil liabilities on behalf of our constituency. These proceedings, as originally proposed, would be conducted transparently in order to ensure the highest standards of equity, fairness, and respect for the rule of law. As we originally proposed, the intention of this extrajudicial organization would be to ease the burden of an already delayed court system, protect the rights of Canadians to a fair trial, and to uphold the rule of law – in recognition that no one is above the law and that every person must be held accountable for their actions lest the administration of justice be brought into disrepute.
As there has thus far been a failure to respond to this petition which was made to the Crown, we take it to mean that there exists no outstanding objection to this intention. In accordance with our constitutional rights as embodied in the Magna Carta, which remains as binding upon the Crown today as the day it was sealed at Runnymede on the fifteenth day of June in the seventeenth year of the reign of King John of England, we do hereby declare the lawful formation of a Common Law Tribunal under this treaty in conduct of justice enshrined as stare decisis.
These Common Law judicial provisions include, but are not limited to, the following:
We reserve the right of habeas corpus, to be free from arbitrary detention or imprisonment before any evidence has been produced within a court, wherein the evidence provides good reason for remand, as well as the right to consult counsel without delay and to be informed of this right.
We reserve the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty before a judge or jury of our peers. Crown counsel must present evidence to an unbiased judge or jury in an open court to prove guilt. If reasonable doubt remains, the accused must be acquitted.
We reserve the right to procedural defense against double jeopardy, that an accused cannot be tried again on the same (or similar) charges following a valid acquittal or conviction.
We reserve the right to negotiate extradition procedure based on bilateral treaties. We recognize political offense exemption involving overt acts or omissions (where there is a duty to act), which prejudice the interests of the state, its government, or the political system. Such provisions allow the state whose assistance has been requested to refuse to hand over a suspect to — or to gather evidence on behalf of — another state, if the requested party’s competent authority determines that the requesting party seeks assistance in order to prosecute an offense of a political character.
We reserve the right of exclusionary rule, which prevents evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the accused constitutional rights from being used in a court of law.
We reserve the right to a fair trial within a reasonable time.
We reserve the right to avoid self-incrimination, including provision that adverse inferences cannot be made by judge or jury regarding the refusal of a defendant to answer questions before or during a trial, hearing or any other legal proceeding.
We reserve the right to remain silent.
We pledge to save from harm The Throne, The Queen, and Her Heirs. We will not sell, nor deny, nor delay right or justice to anyone. The Crown cannot proceed against any freeman, or send others to do so, except according to the lawful sentence of their peers and according to the Common Law. A freeman is not to be amerced for a small offence except in proportion to the nature of the offence, and for a great offence he is to be amerced in accordance with its magnitude, saving to him his livelihood, and a merchant in the same manner, saving to him his stock in trade, and a villein is to be amerced in the same manner, saving to him his growing crops, if they fall into our mercy. And none of the aforesaid amercements is to be imposed except by the oath of trustworthy men of the locality. If anyone has been disseized or dispossessed by the Crown, without lawful judgment of their peers, of lands, castles, liberties, or of their right, it is to be restored to them immediately. And if dispute should arise concerning this, then it is to be dealt with by judgment of the original ‘Committee Of Twenty-Five Barons’ in the security for peace.
All citizens of the realm have a lawful duty to recognize this treaty until the Crown has made redress. Those who fail to honour the treaty of Magna Carta may be held criminally liable for aiding and abetting High Treason.
The above affirmations and claims are valid as to our lawful understanding, and which are sworn by on penalty of perjury and commercial liability.
In putting subjects of the British Crown on public notice of our standing in law, with the intent to prevent any breach of peace, we request, as lawfully obliged, prompt acknowledgement or objection of this notice including any undue consideration.
The wheel of justice must continue to turn – and it will do so under our Common Law Tribunal.
Signed,
Travis Patron, Saskatchewan, “Ye that love the Lord, hate evil: he preserveth the souls of his saints; he delivereth them out of the hand of the wicked.” – Psalms 97:10Adam Stead, Ontario, Member of the Canadian Nationalist Party, “I protest by your rejoicing which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, I die daily.” – 1 Corinthians 15:13Jessica Bauer, Ontario, My heart is not mine, it belongs to my Lord, my family, my people and my nation.Crispin WankelShaw, Alberta, Proud member of the Canadian Nationalist PartyJustin Long, Ontario, Proud member of the Canadian Nationalist PartyStock Foyster, Ontario, Proud Member of the Canadian Nationalist PartyRick Patron, Saskatchewan, Southeast Saskatchewan FarmerMark Dickson, Ontario, United Empire LoyalistJohnathan Bishop, OntarioGarry Currey, ManitobaMaria Maggiore, OntarioAaron Fairbrass, SaskatchewanBenny Hill, Preserve Our Heritage
And stretching out his hand toward his disciples, he said, “Here are my mother and my brothers! For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother.” – Matthew 12: 49, 50
Today, during a public demonstration, I gave the Roman Salute to a cenotaph in the center of my town. This gesture seems to have (unsurprisingly) “ruffled some feathers” and today we are taking the opportunity to clarify and perhaps expand on the message being sent with the ‘Roman Salute’. I do not believe this gesture was done dishonourably or against the sacrifices of those who perished in the conflicts to which the memorial pays tribute. I did this because I believe our country needs political change now more than ever before, and if the recent 43rd Federal Election is any indication, this change will not likely come democratically.
I see being upfront and direct with our stance as the best alternative to resorting to violence amongst one another. In order to proceed in good faith, it is a requirement of us to be upfront and honest with who we are and what we represent. This gesture is not a disrespectful act toward those who the cenotaph memorializes, but quite the opposite: a recognition of the sacrifice they made to defend our nation’s sovereignty. LEST WE FORGET, this is a battle which rages on this very moment! We must continue their fight. Otherwise, that which they stood for may have all been in vain. Ask yourself: if they were alive today to see the current state of affairs, what would they say?During the demonstration, I approached the square, and stood for a while gazing upon the statue of a soldier. I inquired with it guidance on what I was about to do. The statue of the soldier asked “Is your heart true?”, to which I replied without hesitation “Yes it is”, and the statue of the soldier affirmed, stating “Then you may proceed”.
While saluting, I was also instructed to “hold”.
I asked those who were in attendance to notify me immediately if what I was doing was a dishonourable act. The individuals nearest to myself did not claim that this was dishonourable. None of the 3 persons other than myself who were in attendance came forward during the demonstration to object or notify that this gesture was dishonourable.
YES. I am aware the cenotaph memorializes those who fought against a political movement which employed a similar, albeit not identical, variation of this salute. This does not mean we need to discard our history and heritage entirely. It’s called the ‘Roman Salute’ and our ancestors from long ago who used it would have never tolerated the type of government we have lording over us today – calling for the confiscation of our firearms, publishing nothing but filth on the television, and turning a blind eye to illegal immigration.
We are grateful to those who are of understanding and patience.
In no way has it ever been our intention to cause undue harm or disrepute to anyone.
The recent 43rd Federal Election has demonstrated to us (Nationalist Canadians) that, under this current government administration, our self-determination is being suppressed. The Canadian Nationalist Party was not permitted to assemble publicly and communicate electoral policies to voters after the drop of the writ. From the inception of our party (June 1st, 2017) to the conclusion of the 43rd Federal Election (October 21st, 2019), the CNP was denied ubiquitously, and not permitted on a single occasion, to utilize taxpayer-funded infrastructure (City Halls, Convention Centers, University Campuses, Libraries) to assemble and share our ideas for making our country a better place to live.
We have since filed a civil lawsuit alleging a constitutional violation – yet, this litigation is not allowed to proceed due to the current state of emergency. This is a violation of the most fundamental principles of any democracy.
The democratic channel that the Government of Canada is compelled to provide to us, is for all intents and purposes, unavailable to us.
It is now obvious that voting ourselves into prosperity is a fool’s errand. If we are waiting on a democratic reform of our country we might as well take it to our deathbed. There is simply no reason at this point to put any amount of faith in our existing, illusory “democracy”. Liberation is not on the ballot.
Instead, we are sending the signal that we must embrace an anti-democratic political narrative, and this is where the ‘Roman Salute’ comes in.
*Disclaimer: The following is a sermon delivered on April 21st, 2020 to the municipality of Redvers, district of Souris – Moose Mountain, Province Of Saskatchewan, and Dominion Of Canada.
Fellow Canadians and servants of the Lord: peace be upon you this day.
We are gathered here today baring record of the Revelation of Christ, which God gave unto him, to show his servants things which must shortly come to pass.
Son of man, speak to your people and say to them: ‘When I bring the sword against a land, and the people of the land choose one of their men and make him their watchman, and he sees the sword coming against the land and blows the trumpet to warn the people, then if anyone hears the trumpet but does not heed the warning and the sword comes and takes their life, their blood will be on their own head. Since they heard the sound of the trumpet but did not heed the warning, their blood will be on their own head. If they had heeded the warning, they would have saved themselves. But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet to warn the people and the sword comes and takes someone’s life, that person’s life will be taken because of their sin, but I will hold the watchman accountable for their blood.’ Ezekiel 33:2-6
In many different religious teachings around the world, the number 666 is spoken of as the “mark of the beast and number of his name”. The Book of Revelation describes this concept in detail:
Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written therein: for the time is at hand. Revelation 1:3
He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom: Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. Revelation 13:16-18
If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives his mark on his forehead or on his hand, he himself shall also drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out full strength into the cup of His indignation. He shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever; and they have no rest day or night, who worship the beast and his image, and whoever receives the mark of his name. Revelation 14:9-11
And in those days shall men seek death, and shall not find it; and shall desire to die, and death shall flee from them. Revelation 9:6
Then the beast was permitted to wage war against the saints and to conquer them, and it was given authority over every tribe and people and tongue and nation. Revelation 13:7
Then I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for their witness to Jesus and for the word of God, who had not worshipped the beast or his image, and had not received his mark on their foreheads or on their hands. And they lived and reigned with Christ for a thousand years. Revelation 20:4
If the current state of emergency is not lifted within a reasonable time period, and the controlled economic demolition allowed to continue, it is entirely possible we will soon have a cashless society – a new monetary paradigm.
As a federally-sanctioned political constituency, it is within our knowledge, and duty thereof, to disclose the following possibilities to those who would care to hear, on the grounds that such an act is in the public interest:
That the federal government may soon introduce legislation mandating a “digital certificate” for the purposes of identification under the premise of a public health emergency.
That such a digital certificate will be a computational image made in the flesh which references the bitcoin network. By using this network of information, a new religious-political system will emerge. It will utilize artificial intelligence in an authoritarian manner to appear omnipotent and omnipresent. With the awesome power of artificial intelligence, this system will know those who worship it better than anyone else, including themselves and their closest friends and family, and will personalize their approach toward every person who has the mark. The beast will know even the most intimate details about those who receive it.
All people of the will would decide to either accept or reject the mark. Social and financial standing will be of no consideration.
The mark cannot be forced upon one against their will – it must willfully be accepted or rejected. Whether one chooses to accept or reject the mark, that decision must be honoured. Every man and woman shall be defined by their choice.
Rejection of the mark will also carry consequences. Those who reject the mark will be unable to buy or sell.
Fear may be used as a catalyst to encourage acceptance or conformity.
Those who reject the mark may be socially ostracized and even hated. For some, physical death will be a consequence of rejecting the mark.
The mark will exert complete control over its subject because it will cryptographically synchronize with a central server. The mark itself will propagate information to this network by transmition of light. It will be embedded in the right hand or forehead.
Choosing to accept the mark holds severe consequences. Those who accept the mark willfully envelop themselves in a cybernetic tyranny. It is a path which leads to damnation. Those who receive the mark will be unable to end their experience.
If and when any government authority comes forward with such a digital certificate, and presents you with the opportunity, we strongly recommend rejecting the offering and identify it for what it is: deception and manipulation.
Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it. Matthew 7:13,14
Now brother will deliver up brother to death, and a father his child; and children will rise up against parents and cause them to be put to death. And you will be hated by all for My name’s sake. But he who endures to the end will be saved. Matthew 10:21,22
Good luck and may the odds be ever in your favour.
Travis Patron Canadian Nationalist Party Inc.
Appendix:
(Babylonian Talmud – Sukkah 52a). With the end of free will, the opportunity to earn reward and enhance one’s portion in the World to Come will also cease — forever.
We are understood that the last amendment of this property was performed on March 2nd, 2002, that ‘The Redvers Homemaker’s Club’ has since disbanded, and that “the care of the War Memorial was turned over to the Legion”.
Being entrusted to the care of a memorial does not imply lawful ownership of property.
Therefore, unless ‘The Redvers Homemaker’s Club’ can come forward and claim ownership of the property, it must be assumed to be part of the public commons.
We propose the following conditions:
Anyone who intends to use the property must give the public advanced notice and must not conflict with nor unnecessarily burden others who wish to use the space.
Anyone who uses the property must leave it at least as well off as they found it.
Honour and recognize, in good faith, the memory of the soldiers who sacrificed in defense of our national sovereignty from foreign entities as listed on the monument.
Any person(s) of the realm objecting to this notice of intent to seize property is required to come forward without delay and make known their grievances.
Parcel Number = 112535041
*Disclaimer: a previous version of this notice proposed the following condition which has since been amended for the sake of clarity: “Honour and recognize, in good faith, the memory of the soldiers who gave their lives in the Great War of 1914 – 1918 as listed on the monument.”
Travis Patron Canadian Nationalist Party Inc. (306)700-2193
I am writing you today to inform you that our political constituency will be hosting a demonstration within your municipality in order to speak on the current circumstances in our country and their relation to religious scripture.
We are aware the Government Of Saskatchewan has recently declared a state of emergency, and under this pretense, is attempting to further encroach on our ability to gather in the public space. We stand in objection to what we see as an unlawful declaration from the Provincial Government and will make no concessions to limit the size of our demonstration or limit the ability of our members to travel throughout the province. This alarmist declaration of emergency is unprecedented and unnecessary and has a high probability of causing suppression of our economic conditions – especially in rural areas of the province.
During, and leading up to, the recent 43rd Federal Election, our officially-sanctioned political party was not permitted to host publicly and communicate our policies to Canadian voters. We believe this to be a most serious violation of our democratic, constitutional, and fundamental rights as citizens. Under these current circumstances it is essentially impossible to elect a representative from our constituency on the grounds that we are not permitted to host a public event in order to promote our policies and compete in the existing democratic system.
Our denial of a permit after we gained official status with Elections Canada and after the drop of the writ on September 11th, 2019 is only the most pronounced and fundamental example that Canada’s democratic institutions are illegitimate. Despite violating no hate speech legislation and enduring a ridiculous campaign to sabotage our registration efforts, our so-called “guaranteed” rights and freedoms remain unavailable to us.
Failure to respect our right to gather in the public space in order to exchange ideas will be interpreted as yet another state-sanctioned hostility towards us as a people, political constituency, and unique nationality.
Signed, Travis Patron Leader of the Canadian Nationalist Party (306)700-2193
The Canadian Nationalist Party is today making a statement on our deprivation of self-determination under the current government administration in Canada. We are doing this because we believe Canadians have a right to know how their freedoms are being systematically eroded, how many of our federal institutions are no longer operating in good faith, and how many of our elected officials are complicit in all of this. Our experience over the last 3 years leading up to and during the recent 43rd Federal Election has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that we are currently subjected to a government who levies taxation on the population while simultaneously denying them any meaningful representation.
Over the last 3 years, our political constituency has demonstrated that the Government Of Canada is not a democracy. Under this false pretense, we do not have a vote and are being taxed without representation in our government. Under these current circumstances it is essentially impossible to elect a representative from our constituency on the ground that we are not permitted to host a public event in order to promote our policies and compete in the existing democratic system.
Put simply: because of our political beliefs (that Canada is a unique nation who deserves to uphold their sovereignty), we have been excluded from meaningful democratic representation. This treatment is unlawful, unjust, and thoroughly unconstitutional.
Since our campaign began in 2017, our organization has requested from publicly funded institutions such as City Halls, Libraries, University Campuses, and Convention Centers an opportunity to host an event. Despite making our intentions public to “be on the ballet” for the 43rd Federal Election as early as August 2017, without a single exception, we have not been permitted to host a public event. Many of our booking requests have been outright rejected or cancelled for no reason whatsoever. This exclusion of the public commons has continued after we gained official status with Elections Canada and after the drop of the writ on September 11th, 2019.
The recent 43rd Federal Election has fundamentally demonstrated that our right to self-determination, as Canadian Nationalists, is being suppressed by the current administration. Under these circumstances, our ability to assemble publicly and speak our policies to Canadian voters has, and continues to be, denied to us. Despite violating no hate speech legislation and enduring a ridiculous campaign to sabotage our registration efforts, our so-called “guaranteed” rights and freedoms are unavailable to us.
This violation of our constitutional rights includes institutions which are financed by us (the public taxpayer), yet are prohibited to us for reasons never justified. If we choose not to abide by these tax laws, we are liable to be criminally charged and incarcerated (as our supporters have been). We have supporters within our party who have spent time in prison for not paying their “fair share” of taxes, yet the government itself prohibits us from using the institutions these taxes finance to advocate for ourselves. As our reputation is defamed and our freedom is taken from us, this government administration does not even permit us to speak in our own defence.
After we aired these grievances with the necessary federal agencies, it has been alleged that no violation of our electoral procedures has occurred and no explanation has been given.
The Office of the Commissioner of Canada Elections had previously opened a formal review of a complaint filed by the Canadian Nationalist Party which claimed our rights under the Canada Elections Act and Charter Of Rights And Freedoms have been infringed and our ability to communicate policies and nominate candidates has been violated during the recent 43rd Federal Election.
It would appear that the establishment authority in this country is not interested in diplomacy or negotiation of any sort – and they are willing to violate our constitutional “guarantees” to ensure no such luxury is made available to us.
What exactly are public servants upholding in their continued support of this administration? What exactly motivates them through their daily duties? At this point, it is clearly not a sense of honour or integrity.
We have a government which claims to be a democratic state yet all evidence points to the contrary – where is the integrity in supporting such an administration?
Here is the lie: Canada is a democratic and free country.
Here is the truth: Canada is a corporate construct whose leaders have been bought and paid for in order to uphold an illusion of democracy.
No amount of media disinformation or censorship can hide this truth. We will distrain and distress the system until redress is obtained.
There may come a day in the near future when all things without integrity are swept away into the dustbin of history, and every public servant who continued to support this current administration after these claims were made public will be asked:
“Why did you continue supporting a government who was not what it claimed to be?”
Appealing to authority will not be considered a lawful excuse.
