I am writing you today to inform you that our political constituency will be hosting a demonstration within your municipality in order to speak on the current circumstances in our country and their relation to religious scripture.
We are aware the Government Of Saskatchewan has recently declared a state of emergency, and under this pretense, is attempting to further encroach on our ability to gather in the public space. We stand in objection to what we see as an unlawful declaration from the Provincial Government and will make no concessions to limit the size of our demonstration or limit the ability of our members to travel throughout the province. This alarmist declaration of emergency is unprecedented and unnecessary and has a high probability of causing suppression of our economic conditions – especially in rural areas of the province.
During, and leading up to, the recent 43rd Federal Election, our officially-sanctioned political party was not permitted to host publicly and communicate our policies to Canadian voters. We believe this to be a most serious violation of our democratic, constitutional, and fundamental rights as citizens. Under these current circumstances it is essentially impossible to elect a representative from our constituency on the grounds that we are not permitted to host a public event in order to promote our policies and compete in the existing democratic system.
Our denial of a permit after we gained official status with Elections Canada and after the drop of the writ on September 11th, 2019 is only the most pronounced and fundamental example that Canada’s democratic institutions are illegitimate. Despite violating no hate speech legislation and enduring a ridiculous campaign to sabotage our registration efforts, our so-called “guaranteed” rights and freedoms remain unavailable to us.
Failure to respect our right to gather in the public space in order to exchange ideas will be interpreted as yet another state-sanctioned hostility towards us as a people, political constituency, and unique nationality.
Signed, Travis Patron Leader of the Canadian Nationalist Party (306)700-2193
The Canadian Nationalist Party is today making a statement on our deprivation of self-determination under the current government administration in Canada. We are doing this because we believe Canadians have a right to know how their freedoms are being systematically eroded, how many of our federal institutions are no longer operating in good faith, and how many of our elected officials are complicit in all of this. Our experience over the last 3 years leading up to and during the recent 43rd Federal Election has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that we are currently subjected to a government who levies taxation on the population while simultaneously denying them any meaningful representation.
Over the last 3 years, our political constituency has demonstrated that the Government Of Canada is not a democracy. Under this false pretense, we do not have a vote and are being taxed without representation in our government. Under these current circumstances it is essentially impossible to elect a representative from our constituency on the ground that we are not permitted to host a public event in order to promote our policies and compete in the existing democratic system.
Put simply: because of our political beliefs (that Canada is a unique nation who deserves to uphold their sovereignty), we have been excluded from meaningful democratic representation. This treatment is unlawful, unjust, and thoroughly unconstitutional.
Since our campaign began in 2017, our organization has requested from publicly funded institutions such as City Halls, Libraries, University Campuses, and Convention Centers an opportunity to host an event. Despite making our intentions public to “be on the ballet” for the 43rd Federal Election as early as August 2017, without a single exception, we have not been permitted to host a public event. Many of our booking requests have been outright rejected or cancelled for no reason whatsoever. This exclusion of the public commons has continued after we gained official status with Elections Canada and after the drop of the writ on September 11th, 2019.
The recent 43rd Federal Election has fundamentally demonstrated that our right to self-determination, as Canadian Nationalists, is being suppressed by the current administration. Under these circumstances, our ability to assemble publicly and speak our policies to Canadian voters has, and continues to be, denied to us. Despite violating no hate speech legislation and enduring a ridiculous campaign to sabotage our registration efforts, our so-called “guaranteed” rights and freedoms are unavailable to us.
This violation of our constitutional rights includes institutions which are financed by us (the public taxpayer), yet are prohibited to us for reasons never justified. If we choose not to abide by these tax laws, we are liable to be criminally charged and incarcerated (as our supporters have been). We have supporters within our party who have spent time in prison for not paying their “fair share” of taxes, yet the government itself prohibits us from using the institutions these taxes finance to advocate for ourselves. As our reputation is defamed and our freedom is taken from us, this government administration does not even permit us to speak in our own defence.
After we aired these grievances with the necessary federal agencies, it has been alleged that no violation of our electoral procedures has occurred and no explanation has been given.
The Office of the Commissioner of Canada Elections had previously opened a formal review of a complaint filed by the Canadian Nationalist Party which claimed our rights under the Canada Elections Act and Charter Of Rights And Freedoms have been infringed and our ability to communicate policies and nominate candidates has been violated during the recent 43rd Federal Election.
It would appear that the establishment authority in this country is not interested in diplomacy or negotiation of any sort – and they are willing to violate our constitutional “guarantees” to ensure no such luxury is made available to us.
What exactly are public servants upholding in their continued support of this administration? What exactly motivates them through their daily duties? At this point, it is clearly not a sense of honour or integrity.
We have a government which claims to be a democratic state yet all evidence points to the contrary – where is the integrity in supporting such an administration?
Here is the lie: Canada is a democratic and free country.
Here is the truth: Canada is a corporate construct whose leaders have been bought and paid for in order to uphold an illusion of democracy.
No amount of media disinformation or censorship can hide this truth. We will distrain and distress the system until redress is obtained.
There may come a day in the near future when all things without integrity are swept away into the dustbin of history, and every public servant who continued to support this current administration after these claims were made public will be asked:
“Why did you continue supporting a government who was not what it claimed to be?”
Appealing to authority will not be considered a lawful excuse.
TO:
Crown Prosecutor Landry
Chief Judge J.A. Plemel,
Provincial Court Of Saskatchewan
1815 Smith Street
Regina, SK, S4P 2N5
FROM:
Travis Patron
Canadian Nationalist Party Inc.
PO Box 490,
11 Broadway Street
Redvers, SK, S0C 2H0
Date Served: March 31st, 2020
Request For Disclosure
Provincial Court Of Saskatchewan,
Please consider this a request for disclosure regarding the aforementioned file.
The Provincial Court Of Saskatchewan has, after almost 5 months, failed to provide full disclosure to the accused. This delay has occurred before the current state of emergency declared by the Provincial Government.
It is understood disclosure is currently being withheld from the accused. Disclosure has been requested multiple times both before and after retaining counsel:
Failure to provide the accused with full disclosure may violate their constitutional right to a fair trial and may bring the administration of justice into disrepute.
The accused retains the right to use this delay in serving disclosure as a potential defense at trial.
We kindly ask you to compile any and all disclosure relating to the charges currently before the court and serve them unto the accused without delay.
Signed, Travis Patron Canadian Nationalist Party Inc. (306)700-2193
TO:
City Solicitor’s Office
City Of Saskatoon
222 3rd Avenue North,
Saskatoon, SK, S7K 0J5
FROM:
Canadian Nationalist Party Inc.
Travis Patron
PO Box 490,
11 Broadway Street,
Redvers, SK, S0C 2H0
Date Served: March 23rd, 2020
NOTICE OF CORPORATE REPRESENTATION
RE:
Canadian Nationalist Party Inc. v City of Saskatoon
QBG 310 of 2020
Judicial Centre of Saskatoon
File No. 110.0445
ATTENTION: Alan Rankine
City Of Saskatoon,
In response to your letter dated February 25th, 2020, the Canadian Nationalist Party retains the right to be represented by Mr. Patron, citing recent decision in the 2014 case of Howden Bros. Construction Limited v Freshair Enterprises Limited, whereby the defendant was entitled to be represented by a “non-lawyer”.
The criteria for this decision in the case was laid out in [18] as follows:
In light of these authorities, and the emphasis by The Queen’s Bench Rules on access to justice and the timely and cost effective resolution of disputes, I offer the following revised list of factors which may be relevant on a Rule 2 34(2) application:
(i) Whether the proposed representative has been duly authorized by the corporation to act as its representative in the action;
(ii) The nature of the connection, such as share ownership, an office or employment, between the proposed representative and the corporation;
(iii) The structure of the corporation in terms of shareholders, officers and directors, and whether it is closely held;
(iv) Whether the interests of shareholders, officers, directors, employees, creditors and other potential stakeholders are adequately protected by the granting of leave, taking account of the significance of the action and its potential impact on the corporation and those stakeholders;
(v) Whether the proposed representative is, in light of the nature of both the claim and the proposed representative, reasonably capable of comprehending the issues in the litigation, participating in the court’s processes, and conducting her or himself in a manner that will promote the timely and effective resolution of the claim;
(vi) The potential impact of refusing or granting the order on the financial and other interests of the other parties, whether due to the possibility that the proceedings will not be conducted in a manner that is proportionate in light of the nature of the claim, or otherwise;
(vii) Whether the corporation is financially capable of retaining counsel; and,
(viii) Any other relevant factor arising from the specific facts.
Canadian Nationalist Party Inc. observes that permitting Mr. Patron to act as counsel for the corporation is in alignment with at least criteria (i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)(vi).
We intend to have Mr. Patron continue acting as our corporate representation in this matter and are requesting from Court Of Queen’s Bench that this intention be honoured.
Signed, Travis Patron Canadian Nationalist Party Inc. (306)700-2193
TO:
Premier Scott Moe
Government Of Saskatchewan
226 Legislative Building
Regina, SK, S4S 0B3
CC:
Chief Judge J.A. Plemel,
Crown Prosecutor Landry
Provincial Court Of Saskatchewan
1815 Smith Street
Regina, SK, S4P 2N5
FROM:
Travis Patron
Canadian Nationalist Party Inc.
PO Box 490,
11 Broadway Street
Redvers, SK, S0C 2H0
DATED: March 23rd, 2020
NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO CURE
Government Of Saskatchewan,
I am writing you today after not receiving a response in regards to our recent Notice Of Conditional Acceptance served to your office on March 16th within the allotted 7 (seven) days.
Whereas it is my understanding that Article 61 of our Magna Carta was successfully invoked on March 23rd, 2001, it is my required duty to stand entirely under the tenets of English Constitution in lawful dissent, and that I am required to request a properly convened court de jure in accordance with “a lawful sentence of a jury of peers and according to the Common Law” in order to settle the charges which are currently before me on behalf of your court.
It is not my intention to conduct myself unlawfully nor act against the conditions before me. Whilst the Magna Carta provides a ‘lawful excuse’ to distress the crown and its institutions at this time, it is to my understanding that I cannot consent to any other method of settling the aforementioned charges except by way of “a lawful sentence of a jury of peers and according to the Common Law”. English Constitutional Law forbids me to aid and abet the Crown until redress has been made in accordance with Article 61. It also forbids me to aid and abet any other man or woman who is not also standing in lawful dissent under Article 61 of the Magna Carta (1215). We must (by law) also compel you, Government Of Saskatchewan, to abide by constitutional law and to stand with the people in lawful dissent as is demanded of us.
Failure to respond to this notice within the reasonable time frame allotted, or without providing evidence in substance that clearly disproves Article 61 is currently in effect, shall be taken to mean by all interested parties that there exists no lawful objection against the claims made in this letter.
We are all responsible and culpable for our actions or omissions under English Constitutional Law. Ignorance is no defence. Please check the facts for yourself before replying: Public Notice: Invocation Magna Carta
Be it understood that this notice is a lawful instrument which requires your attention and prompt response. This ‘Notice Of Opportunity To Cure’ may be used as evidence in my defence and is the second notice to be served to your office regarding this matter. The first preceding notice has thus far either been ignored or mislaid. This succeeding notice is to be considered a further opportunity to rebut or confirm our original observation made that Article 61 of the Magna Carta is currently in effect and that it stands as the Supreme Law of the realm.
Allowing for a reasonable time frame for you to respond, we provide a further 7 (seven) days from your receipt of this document for you to reply in substance and remain in honour, enabling us to remedy this matter and save any breach of peace.
Whereas it stands that the invocation of this most important constitutional Magna Carta did occur on the aforesaid date, and that it currently stands as the Supreme Law of the realm, I ask you kindly to provide evidence in substance to counter this lawful requirement of court de jure within 7 (seven) days from your receipt of this notice.
Any reply must be made on your full commercial liability and on penalty of perjury.
Signed, Travis Patron Canadian Nationalist Party Inc. (306)700-2193
To: Premier Scott Moe
Government Of Saskatchewan
226 Legislative Building
Regina, SK, S4S 0B3
From: Travis Patron
Canadian Nationalist Party
PO Box 490
Redvers, SK, S0C 2H0
Date Served: March 19th, 2020
NOTICE OF OBJECTION: DECLARING STATE OF EMERGENCY
Government Of Saskatchewan,
I am writing you today in order to put you on notice of our constituency’s objection towards your recent declaration of emergency within the province.
Specifically, we object to complying with the Government Of Saskatchewan’s alleged “ability to limit travel to or from a community or region of the province”. Additionally, we object to the request to “prohibit public gatherings to 50 people or less”. Various municipalities within your jurisdiction (Saskatoon) have already violated our constitutional and democratic rights to assemble publicly and speak policies to the voting public during an election.
We will not tolerate further encroachment on our ability to gather in the public space.
As recent as March 18th, the Government Of Canada reports that the “coronavirus”, has a meager 690 confirmed cases country-wide, while news media outlets report a grand total of 8 deaths …
Your alarmist declaration in the province of Saskatchewan in response to these circumstances is unprecedented and unnecessary.
These rash actions have a high probability of causing undo suppression of our economic conditions – especially in rural areas of the province.
We demand you annul the aforementioned conditions, allowing free travel of all residents within the province, and not make any attempt to limit public gatherings to 50 people.
Signed,
Travis Patron Leader of the Canadian Nationalist Party
