Categories
News Release

CNP Issuing Tax Receipts

The Canadian Nationalist Party is continuing to issue tax receipts for those who have generously donated to the party. These receipts can be used to claim a tax credit due to the fact the CNP is a federally-registered party.

To make a donation: Party Donation

TAX CREDITS

All Canadians are eligible to receive generous tax credits when they donate to the Canadian Nationalist Party. The size of donation determines the tax credit available.

If you have already made a contribution this year, please use the table below to calculate your cumulative tax credit.

  • Donations between 0 and $400: give you a 75% refund.
  • Donations between $400 and $750: give you $300 plus 50% of any amount over $400.
  • Donations over $750: give you $475 plus 33% of any amount over $750 up to a maximum of $650 per year.

LIMITS ON CONTRIBUTIONS

Only Canadian citizens or permanent residents may make political contributions, in each of the following amounts:

  • No more than $1,625 in any calendar year to each registered political party.
  • No more than $1,625 in total in any calendar year to the combined entities of each registered political party (Electoral District Associations, Nomination Contestants and Candidate campaigns).
  • No more than $1,625 in total between all registered leadership contestants in a particular leadership contest.

LEARN MORE

For more information about tax credits please visit the Canada Revenue Agency website and for more information about contribution limits, please visit Elections Canada.

Categories
Notice

Notice Of Claim Of Right: Common Law Tribunal

*Disclaimer: The following is a declaration served on April 28th, 2020 to the municipality of Redvers, district of Souris – Moose Mountain, Province Of Saskatchewan, and Dominion Of Canada.

Fellow Canadians,

We are gathered here today declaring the lawful formation of a Common Law Tribunal in accordance with our constitutional rights embodied in the Magna Carta of 1215, which was successfully invoked on March 23rd, 2001, and sworn on by our political constituency on March 3rd, 2020. With God as our witness, and as a declaration calling on the assistance of the community in asserting Natural Justice and Due Process, we swear to do everything in our power to proceed with this Common Law Tribunal lawfully, honourably, and truthfully.

When one of you has a grievance against another, does he dare go to law before the unrighteous instead of the saints? Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world is to be judged by you, are you incompetent to try trivial cases? Do you not know that we are to judge angels? How much more, then, matters pertaining to this life! So if you have such cases, why do you lay them before those who have no standing in the church? I say this to your shame. Can it be that there is no one among you wise enough to settle a dispute between the brothers, but brother goes to law against brother, and that before unbelievers? To have lawsuits at all with one another is already a defeat for you. Why not rather suffer wrong? Why not rather be defrauded? But you yourselves wrong and defraud—even your own brothers! Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God. – 1 Corinthians 6, Lawsuits Among Believers

As an additional lawful precedent for establishing a Common Law Tribunal under the dominion of our federal political constituency, we reference Aboriginal Sentencing Circles, which are used throughout Canada for the purposes of restorative justice, and rehabilitating the offender to avoid recidivism and reoffense:

Sentencing circles have been used in much of the country, mostly at the provincial/territorial court level, in minor criminal cases involving Aboriginal offenders and their victims. Various Supreme Court of Canada decisions have interpreted changes to the Criminal Code that instructed courts to consider alternative sentences for all offenders, and to pay particular attention to the circumstances of Aboriginal offenders. The Supreme Court found that sentencing judges must examine the unique factors which may have played a part in bringing a particular Aboriginal offender before the courts, and the types of available sanctions and sentencing procedures (including sentencing circles) which may be appropriate in light of the offender’s Aboriginal heritage or identity. – Alternative Approaches, Canada’s Court System

On November 27th, 2019, we the Canadian Nationalist Party, petitioned the Crown, requesting the establishment of an extrajudicial tribunal capable of settling criminal and civil liabilities on behalf of our constituency. These proceedings, as originally proposed, would be conducted transparently in order to ensure the highest standards of equity, fairness, and respect for the rule of law. As we originally proposed, the intention of this extrajudicial organization would be to ease the burden of an already delayed court system, protect the rights of Canadians to a fair trial, and to uphold the rule of law – in recognition that no one is above the law and that every person must be held accountable for their actions lest the administration of justice be brought into disrepute.

As there has thus far been a failure to respond to this petition which was made to the Crown, we take it to mean that there exists no outstanding objection to this intention. In accordance with our constitutional rights as embodied in the Magna Carta, which remains as binding upon the Crown today as the day it was sealed at Runnymede on the fifteenth day of June in the seventeenth year of the reign of King John of England, we do hereby declare the lawful formation of a Common Law Tribunal under this treaty in conduct of justice enshrined as stare decisis.

These Common Law judicial provisions include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • We reserve the right of habeas corpus, to be free from arbitrary detention or imprisonment before any evidence has been produced within a court, wherein the evidence provides good reason for remand, as well as the right to consult counsel without delay and to be informed of this right.
  • We reserve the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty before a judge or jury of our peers. Crown counsel must present evidence to an unbiased judge or jury in an open court to prove guilt. If reasonable doubt remains, the accused must be acquitted.
  • We reserve the right to procedural defense against double jeopardy, that an accused cannot be tried again on the same (or similar) charges following a valid acquittal or conviction.
  • We reserve the right to negotiate extradition procedure based on bilateral treaties. We recognize political offense exemption involving overt acts or omissions (where there is a duty to act), which prejudice the interests of the state, its government, or the political system. Such provisions allow the state whose assistance has been requested to refuse to hand over a suspect to — or to gather evidence on behalf of — another state, if the requested party’s competent authority determines that the requesting party seeks assistance in order to prosecute an offense of a political character.
  • We reserve the right of exclusionary rule, which prevents evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the accused constitutional rights from being used in a court of law.
  • We reserve the right to a fair trial within a reasonable time.
  • We reserve the right to avoid self-incrimination, including provision that adverse inferences cannot be made by judge or jury regarding the refusal of a defendant to answer questions before or during a trial, hearing or any other legal proceeding.
  • We reserve the right to remain silent.

We pledge to save from harm The Throne, The Queen, and Her Heirs. We will not sell, nor deny, nor delay right or justice to anyone. The Crown cannot proceed against any freeman, or send others to do so, except according to the lawful sentence of their peers and according to the Common Law. A freeman is not to be amerced for a small offence except in proportion to the nature of the offence, and for a great offence he is to be amerced in accordance with its magnitude, saving to him his livelihood, and a merchant in the same manner, saving to him his stock in trade, and a villein is to be amerced in the same manner, saving to him his growing crops, if they fall into our mercy. And none of the aforesaid amercements is to be imposed except by the oath of trustworthy men of the locality. If anyone has been disseized or dispossessed by the Crown, without lawful judgment of their peers, of lands, castles, liberties, or of their right, it is to be restored to them immediately. And if dispute should arise concerning this, then it is to be dealt with by judgment of the original ‘Committee Of Twenty-Five Barons’ in the security for peace.

All citizens of the realm have a lawful duty to recognize this treaty until the Crown has made redress. Those who fail to honour the treaty of Magna Carta may be held criminally liable for aiding and abetting High Treason.

The above affirmations and claims are valid as to our lawful understanding, and which are sworn by on penalty of perjury and commercial liability.

In putting subjects of the British Crown on public notice of our standing in law, with the intent to prevent any breach of peace, we request, as lawfully obliged, prompt acknowledgement or objection of this notice including any undue consideration.

The wheel of justice must continue to turn – and it will do so under our Common Law Tribunal.

Signed,

Travis Patron, Saskatchewan, “Ye that love the Lord, hate evil: he preserveth the souls of his saints; he delivereth them out of the hand of the wicked.” – Psalms 97:10
Adam Stead, Ontario, Member of the Canadian Nationalist Party, “I protest by your rejoicing which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord, I die daily.” – 1 Corinthians 15:13
Jessica Bauer, Ontario, My heart is not mine, it belongs to my Lord, my family, my people and my nation.
Crispin WankelShaw, Alberta, Proud member of the Canadian Nationalist Party
Justin Long, Ontario, Proud member of the Canadian Nationalist Party
Stock Foyster, Ontario, Proud Member of the Canadian Nationalist Party
Rick Patron, Saskatchewan, Southeast Saskatchewan Farmer
Mark Dickson, Ontario, United Empire Loyalist
Johnathan Bishop, Ontario
Garry Currey, Manitoba
Maria Maggiore, Ontario
Aaron Fairbrass, Saskatchewan
Benny Hill, Preserve Our Heritage
Categories
Activism

Embrace The Roman Salute

And stretching out his hand toward his disciples, he said, “Here are my mother and my brothers! For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother.” – Matthew 12: 49, 50

Today, during a public demonstration, I gave the Roman Salute to a cenotaph in the center of my town. This gesture seems to have (unsurprisingly) “ruffled some feathers” and today we are taking the opportunity to clarify and perhaps expand on the message being sent with the ‘Roman Salute’. I do not believe this gesture was done dishonourably or against the sacrifices of those who perished in the conflicts to which the memorial pays tribute. I did this because I believe our country needs political change now more than ever before, and if the recent 43rd Federal Election is any indication, this change will not likely come democratically.

I see being upfront and direct with our stance as the best alternative to resorting to violence amongst one another. In order to proceed in good faith, it is a requirement of us to be upfront and honest with who we are and what we represent. This gesture is not a disrespectful act toward those who the cenotaph memorializes, but quite the opposite: a recognition of the sacrifice they made to defend our nation’s sovereignty. LEST WE FORGET, this is a battle which rages on this very moment! We must continue their fight. Otherwise, that which they stood for may have all been in vain. Ask yourself: if they were alive today to see the current state of affairs, what would they say?
During the demonstration, I approached the square, and stood for a while gazing upon the statue of a soldier. I inquired with it guidance on what I was about to do. The statue of the soldier asked “Is your heart true?”, to which I replied without hesitation “Yes it is”, and the statue of the soldier affirmed, stating “Then you may proceed”.

While saluting, I was also instructed to “hold”.

I asked those who were in attendance to notify me immediately if what I was doing was a dishonourable act. The individuals nearest to myself did not claim that this was dishonourable. None of the 3 persons other than myself who were in attendance came forward during the demonstration to object or notify that this gesture was dishonourable.

YES. I am aware the cenotaph memorializes those who fought against a political movement which employed a similar, albeit not identical, variation of this salute. This does not mean we need to discard our history and heritage entirely. It’s called the ‘Roman Salute’ and our ancestors from long ago who used it would have never tolerated the type of government we have lording over us today – calling for the confiscation of our firearms, publishing nothing but filth on the television, and turning a blind eye to illegal immigration.

I can understand how some may be confused or even offended at such a gesture. I would urge our fellow citizens to understand that such a gesture carries only those connotations that are ascribed to it – and for us, it is one of honour, strength, and justice. I would also ask them to consider how we should be expected to respond given that during and leading up to the recent 43rd Federal Election we were not been permitted access to the public commons in a meaningful way in order to promote our policies and compete democratically. Finally, I would implore Canadians to consider how unaccountable our federal government has become and how this is negatively affecting the lives of Canadians.

We are grateful to those who are of understanding and patience.

In no way has it ever been our intention to cause undue harm or disrepute to anyone.

The recent 43rd Federal Election has demonstrated to us (Nationalist Canadians) that, under this current government administration, our self-determination is being suppressed. The Canadian Nationalist Party was not permitted to assemble publicly and communicate electoral policies to voters after the drop of the writ. From the inception of our party (June 1st, 2017) to the conclusion of the 43rd Federal Election (October 21st, 2019), the CNP was denied ubiquitously, and not permitted on a single occasion, to utilize taxpayer-funded infrastructure (City Halls, Convention Centers, University Campuses, Libraries) to assemble and share our ideas for making our country a better place to live.

We have since filed a civil lawsuit alleging a constitutional violation – yet, this litigation is not allowed to proceed due to the current state of emergency. This is a violation of the most fundamental principles of any democracy.

The democratic channel that the Government of Canada is compelled to provide to us, is for all intents and purposes, unavailable to us.

It is now obvious that voting ourselves into prosperity is a fool’s errand. If we are waiting on a democratic reform of our country we might as well take it to our deathbed. There is simply no reason at this point to put any amount of faith in our existing, illusory “democracy”. Liberation is not on the ballot.

Instead, we are sending the signal that we must embrace an anti-democratic political narrative, and this is where the ‘Roman Salute’ comes in.

We welcome those into our political constituency who would also embrace the Roman Salute.